Inter: Tweak the interrobang (U+203d) glyph

Created on 11 Sep 2018  Â·  16Comments  Â·  Source: rsms/inter

Wow, your font is beautiful! I recently learned about it from here.

I might switch to it as the default font on my blog!

I love interrobangs (‽). Can you please tweak its design so that the exclamation and question mark components of that unicode are not superimposed strictly vertically? (I like the fact that in the version in Inter UI, the ! is not intersecting ? -- which happens in almost all sans serif fonts.. making that glyph look like a typo!).

For example, the interrobang in Iosevka (specimens - U+203d) is creatively designed; it's distinguishable, and also doesn't look like a typewriter typo.

Thanks!

Add

Most helpful comment

Finally got around to this today and made a bunch of variations, both in the style of "punch out hole in question mark" as well as the "v" shaped approach. Settled on the latter as the former degraded quickly with small sizes.

screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 22 15
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 22 35
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 22 24
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 23 24
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 30 45
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 31 00
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 31 24
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 31 17

This was part of a larger set of work for v3 on both question marks and exclamation points:
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 10 50
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 10 58
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 11 05
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 11 10

cc @mwichary

All 16 comments

[Reference: Interrobang of Iosevka]
screen shot 2018-09-17 at 09 18 18

BTW, have you seen this @kaushalmodi
https://www.netflix.com/watch/80243761

@rsms Thanks for categorizing this as an enhancement.

have you seen this @kaushalmodi https://www.netflix.com/watch/80243761

I have not seen that (didn't know of that "Explained" series).. adding that to my Watch List :)

I got hooked onto interrobangs after I listened to the 99% Invisible podcast episode - Interrobangs. That led me to buy the Shady Characters book (which has the most delightful typography that I have seen in print). I am reading through it right now.

So, while I cannot do much typography stuff myself, I am really interested in it, and so will definitely watch the link you pasted :)


Right now, for the lack of a good interrobang glyph in Serif fonts, I am forced to use the Iosevka Interrobang on my blog:

Use of Interrobang glyph on <a href="https://scripter.co">https://scripter.co</a>

@rsms Thanks for linking that Explained episode. It contains more details about Interrobang history that the Shady Characters book did not cover.

Btw, another good candidate, I think, for the Interrobang glyph is the middle one in the picture below:

Proposed interrobangs from Type Talks, March-April 1962, as drawn by Jack Lipton

Finally got around to this today and made a bunch of variations, both in the style of "punch out hole in question mark" as well as the "v" shaped approach. Settled on the latter as the former degraded quickly with small sizes.

screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 22 15
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 22 35
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 22 24
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 23 24
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 30 45
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 31 00
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 31 24
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 31 17

This was part of a larger set of work for v3 on both question marks and exclamation points:
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 10 50
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 10 58
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 11 05
screen shot 2018-09-22 at 23 11 10

cc @mwichary

Here's a build with the above to test:
Inter-UI-3.0-c178ada07d.zip

@rsms Wow, thank you so much! That interrobang looks amazing!

Thanks @kaushalmodi. I’m not entirely sold on this yet though. Would be great to have this tested in some real-world scenarios. I’m a little worried that it loses the question mark shape surrounded by lots of text.

I’m a little worried that it loses the question mark shape surrounded by lots of text.

I'll deploy this beta version of Inter UI on my blog in the next week, and provide my feedback. Thanks again.

I’m a little worried that it loses the question mark shape surrounded by lots of text.

I can also kind of see that.. (non-typographically-technical lanuguage follows..)

The regular question mark has 270 degrees or roughly around that curve forming the top portion of the "?" .. and I believe the new ‽ has 180 degrees of that curve? is that the reason?

Would the Inter UI ‽ hold more of the "question mark value" if the curve is somewhere between 180 and 270 degrees i.e. make it look more like a hook than a sideaways bowl?

I really apologize for this metaphorical explanation.. I don't know how to describe it technically.

Here's a take that's more similar to that of Iosevka:

screen shot 2018-09-23 at 18 43 55

Compared to other iterations:

screen shot 2018-09-23 at 18 45 13

screen shot 2018-09-23 at 18 45 19

A few more

screen shot 2018-09-23 at 18 52 59

screen shot 2018-09-23 at 18 53 44

Close-ups of some of the alternatives:

screen shot 2018-09-23 at 18 54 24screen shot 2018-09-23 at 18 54 15screen shot 2018-09-23 at 18 54 08screen shot 2018-09-23 at 18 54 01screen shot 2018-09-23 at 18 53 51

Final take for tonight:

screen shot 2018-09-23 at 19 18 22
screen shot 2018-09-23 at 19 18 38
screen shot 2018-09-23 at 19 18 29

Close up: (doesn't look very good large)
screen shot 2018-09-23 at 19 18 17
screen shot 2018-09-23 at 19 18 10

Pref 1

In terms of simplicity, and having the glyph quickly convey its meaning to the reader, I find this to be the best:

Pref 2

This one is stylistic but not at the cost of losing its meaning. It's unique too.

Pref 3

About this last iteration, I'm not so sure and may be it's just me.. just because this does not have the 270 degree question mark hook.


I cannot make up my mind on "Pref 1" vs "Pref 2"; both are awesome. I'll go by your judgment.

@rsms Was something else expected from me? Did my last comment not help?

@kaushalmodi It shipped in version 3.0 :–) I just forgot to close the issue when it did.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings