Inav: Oplink Modem Revolution

Created on 29 Sep 2017  路  7Comments  路  Source: iNavFlight/inav

I would like to be able to use the oplink modem on the revolution board.
Anyone try to implement this module?

Thanks

Val

All 7 comments

I'm not aware of any attempts to port Oplink modem into CF or INAV

I have one of those boards available, but I don't have much interest in adding support for it since I don't have anything to interact with it from the ground.

Hi, well I'm currently working on getting the RFM22 working within BF. Mainly for my own interest as I didn't think there was any interest out there.
I have a proof of concept setup running. 2-way serial data transmission that has been tested with Mavlink MSP and RX_Serial protocols.

It is not 100% reliable, contains no frequency hopping or configuration. But it is a start. Once I'm have it a bit further along I'll do a PR and see if I can get some others using it.

Any interest?

@atomiclama I have no objections to a PR adding support for it. Could you let me know which hardware would I need to test it? Thanks!

@atomiclama Yes!

Blimey that was a quick response, nice to know there is some interest.

OK when I'm back home I'll put together the information / HW etc. I don't get much time for my hobby so please don't expect fast progress.
I'll also have a look to see how much iNav is different from BF in the RX_SPI area.

Are there any recommendations for GC SW that can handle just Mavlink telemetry? Currently using Mission planner but seams a bit old and clunky. QGround Control I can't get to handle just telemetry. Don't have an Android so can't use the aps for that.

I belive this is dead issue now. Original board is discontinued and not popular after all. Closing, thanks for participating

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

tadamox picture tadamox  路  3Comments

jasonsmit4 picture jasonsmit4  路  3Comments

mrcottonmouth picture mrcottonmouth  路  3Comments

Jetrell picture Jetrell  路  4Comments

Painless360 picture Painless360  路  4Comments