Not able to change filter option in excel style filter.
It is listing only filtered option.
It should list the unique values from grid data and old filtered value as checked

@rssureshkumar Hi currently we do not plan to change this as it is by Design provided from our US team @StefanIvanov and @DaniMarinov if you guys think this can be an improvement to our current solution please replay in the issue.
If I understand correctly the bug report is that instead of seeing all unique column values on the second opening of the filter, it only shows the ones matching the filter defined during the previous time the dialog was open. We have discussed what enhancements we could offer and decided to add the capability to clear the filter in the dialog that upon applied would let you have the full collection next time you open the excel style filter.
Yes, In excel always it will list all unique values and filtered values as checked. We can add or remove values to filter by checking or unchecking items from the list. Clear can provide option to change the value when filtering single item .But it is very hard when working with multiple values. For example first time I have selected many random items . On next time I would like to add/remove some items at this time once I clear the filter I will loose all of my previous selection and I have to restart from first. Users are expecting like excel and commented as unusable. Please let me know any possibilities to achieve the same.
There's two things here that need to be considered.
In general, all of the UI is implemented to work with the collection that the user sees, meaning the filtered down collection. This means that when a filtering UI is opened, we want the user to see only the values that remain after applying filters on other columns. The current implementation does not exclude filters applied by the current column, which leads to the behavior that you want changed.
What we can implement as a change would result in the following behavior:
E.g. 1. We have Name, Country and City columns.
The user opens the filtering UI for
Countryand applies a filter for only US and Canada.
Then the user opens the filtering UI forCountryagain. We want the user to see all unique values for country, with US and Canada being checked and the rest unchecked.
E.g. 2. We have Name, Country and City columns.
The user opens the filtering UI for
Countryand applies a filter for only US and Canada.
Then the user opens the filtering UI forName. We want the user to see only the unique names that belong to records withCountrybeing US or Canada.
E.g. 3. We have Name, Country and City columns.
The user opens the filtering UI for
Countryand applies a filter for only US and Canada.
Then the user opens the filtering UI forCity. The user sees all unique values forCityfor records that have theirCountrybeing US or Canada. The user filters out Vancouver and Philadelphia.
Then the user opens the filtering UI forCityagain to change the selection. The collection has all unique values forCitywithCountrybeing US or Canada, with all checked, except for Vancouver and Philadelphia.
@rssureshkumar Please confirm that the behavior that you're expecting is what I have given as examples.
@bkulov @sstoyanovIG In order to have this, we would need to feed the collection not through filteredData, but through the filtered collection with all filtering expressions applied, except for the filtering expressions for the current column the user interacts with.
@kdinev
Yes, exactly same as users expectation.
E.g. 4. We have Name, Country and City columns.
User clears any of two applied filters for example Country and City then name becomes primary and once user opens filtering UI for Name. user wants see all unique values for Name.
And if the filtering UI provides option to assign custom list with control for checkbox. It can be customized for any user requirement.
And search in filtering UI also needs to be taken care.
@rssureshkumar HI can you clarify what do you mean by your last comments ? "And search in filtering UI also needs to be taken care."
@rssureshkumar The search will react to what's available in the list. The custom list will become available as a strategy method to provide the unique values to the excel-style filter UI. This can be used, for example, to call a back-end service to retrieve the unique values. If a custom list is provided then that would mean custom filtering operands for the column, as well as custom search in the list, meaning all those would have to be provided as callbacks/strategies.
@SlavUI
1.Select all option should be visible on search to check / uncheck all searched values.
@rssureshkumar I meant that the strategy injection mechanism would allow to inject even logic that does server-side operations. The client-side would work for sure.
Most helpful comment
There's two things here that need to be considered.
In general, all of the UI is implemented to work with the collection that the user sees, meaning the filtered down collection. This means that when a filtering UI is opened, we want the user to see only the values that remain after applying filters on other columns. The current implementation does not exclude filters applied by the current column, which leads to the behavior that you want changed.
What we can implement as a change would result in the following behavior:
E.g. 1. We have
Name,CountryandCitycolumns.E.g. 2. We have
Name,CountryandCitycolumns.E.g. 3. We have
Name,CountryandCitycolumns.@rssureshkumar Please confirm that the behavior that you're expecting is what I have given as examples.
@bkulov @sstoyanovIG In order to have this, we would need to feed the collection not through
filteredData, but through the filtered collection with all filtering expressions applied, except for the filtering expressions for the current column the user interacts with.