Gutenberg: Placeholders to look more like placeholders

Created on 12 Jun 2020  路  3Comments  路  Source: WordPress/gutenberg

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

With the direction of G2 styling, placeholders look a bit too much like the rest of the UI, with little distinction with it. I suggest modifying the placeholder component a bit to make it more apparent that its drag-and-drop capable (if the prop exists), and stands out as a placeholder more.

Some callouts:

  1. Currently we don't draw any attention to the drag-and-drop nature of the placeholder. It doesn't look, or say, the part. I added a dashed border to draw attention to that, as well as added language for it.
  2. I noticed that "Browse" is used a good bit for referencing the uploading of assets online.
  3. I simplified the instructions + multiple call to actions by combining them and using the descriptive text as CTAs.
  4. I moved the Media Library action as the primary here, though we could move it to Browse/Upload if data suggests that's the primary action.

Current placeholder in full context:
Screen Shot 2020-06-12 at 3 47 49 PM

Current placeholder:
Screen Shot 2020-06-12 at 3 45 54 PM

Suggested:
Screen Shot 2020-06-12 at 3 46 24 PM

Thoughts? :)

Needs Design Feedback [Type] Enhancement

Most helpful comment

This looks great @richtabor .

P.S. Looking back I think the placeholders (and a few other bits of the Gutenberg UI) have regressed as they were better with a grey background and center aligned.

All 3 comments

This looks great @richtabor .

P.S. Looking back I think the placeholders (and a few other bits of the Gutenberg UI) have regressed as they were better with a grey background and center aligned.

Perhaps there's a compromise that could be made here that's closer to the current design using higher contrast colors and almost identical patterns.

Forgive my in-browser mock:

image

I agree the compromise is a big step in the right direction. How about a background color as well? 馃檹

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings