
When you get to this screen, if the user types in a username without clicking "add", the "next" button can still be pressed. This is confusing.
I welcome @sandrina-p's input here, but my suggestion would be to remove the blue add button in the input field, and instead change the green "Next ->" button to a blue "Add" button anytime the input field has text in it.
Also add a circle with an x to the input field that when clicked/tapped clears the input field.
When the input field is clear of any username, the green button should return.
Also, if there are any spaces in the username, or any other invalid username characters, the vuelidate thing should kick in put a red (really: $is-danger) highlight around the field and shake it if "Add" is clicked, and let the user know that usernames cannot have spaces in them.
Remember to always use variables instead of actual raw colors for the colors of the labels so that theming and internationalization works.
These changes should also be applied to the simple/invite widget. Both widgets in fact should be merged into one (if they aren't already) under the components/ directory.
@taoeffect do you think it would be a good idea to also allow users to invite others to a group using a direct access link, like Discord does?

I think this would help make this step more user friendly, but I'm not sure about how secure this method is.
@mmbotelho Yes, I think that's a great idea! 馃槃 馃憤
Finished working on a solution for this issue. As mentioned on Slack, the main changes I am suggesting are:
skip this step button. It is already possible to skip the step today (by simply clicking next), but I believe that this way it's clearer;back and next buttons", by placing the "back" on the far left and the "next" on the far right. I believe this disposition makes more sense for people that write using the left-to-right orientation, because left usually is associated automatically with back and right associated with moving forward.Small preview of how it looks like:

If everyone agrees (@taoeffect , @dotmacro ), I'm ready to close this issue!
Let's leave it open so that it doesn't get lost, and to be closed with an "implement this" issue (or re-assigned).
Also, great work! 馃 馃挴 馃憤
OK, makes sense.
Thank you! 馃槃
Closing this issue because we're completely changing how we invite people.
Most helpful comment
Finished working on a solution for this issue. As mentioned on Slack, the main changes I am suggesting are:
skip this stepbutton. It is already possible to skip the step today (by simply clicking next), but I believe that this way it's clearer;backandnextbuttons", by placing the "back" on the far left and the "next" on the far right. I believe this disposition makes more sense for people that write using the left-to-right orientation, because left usually is associated automatically with back and right associated with moving forward.Mockups:
Small preview of how it looks like:

If everyone agrees (@taoeffect , @dotmacro ), I'm ready to close this issue!