Godot-docs: C# example should state GD.Print not GD.print

[puthre]

Godot 3.2
https://godotengine.org/article/introducing-csharp-godot has an example with GD.print but in fact it should be GD.Print
GD.print throws an error.

[akien-mga]

GD.print was valid back then. We can't go back and fix old blog posts when the engine evolves, any technical blog post older than a year will almost always be outdated.

[puthre]

Shouldn't this be part of the documentation that changes in line with the engine?

[akien-mga]

It is: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/getting_started/scripting/c_sharp/c_sharp_basics.html

Such blog posts pre-date documentation and are often use as base material for more in-depth documentation. They're only meant to give users a first glimpse of pre-release material while it's fresh out of the oven.

[pycbouh]

@akien-mga I don't know if it's reasonable or not, but since the article is likely to pop up for some in search results and there are code samples in there, can we add a block at the top of it stating that the information is/may be outdated and link the docs in there? There is an obvious date up in there, but it may not be as obvious that this is a blog and not a knowledge base article, so an explicit statement can be clearer for some people and prevent issues such as this one.