1) Add "Incoming" and "outgoing" accounts for bank reconciliation
2) Add functionality for automatic reconciliation with bank statements via CSV upload template

hi all,
how will the different dataformats of different banks be handled?
I recon different banks will provide different .csv files
Also, will the Bankstatements automatically be associated to the invoices?
I recon different banks will provide different .csv files
I concur. There needs to be a setup area where we define the csv structure that the bank gives us and not force the admin to use what erpnext wants the format/template to be. Things the setup form would need to include:
I would also recommend that you provide option of having more that one setup record per company incase more than one bank is used.
Hi there,
We're really looking forward to this feature and glad to see it's shortlisted for v7.3 ! Are there other issues to track progress (and maybe do some early testing?)
Cheers,
Jun
@jmatsushita this is not yet started and no ETA on this yet.
If you want this urgently, maybe get someone to build it for you or start a bounty.
It already exists a international standard on file format, the ofx files.
Better than csv. What do you think?
Mostly of banks supports ofx, and it doesn't need to be mapped, since it is
standard for all banks.
The only thing that is holding me to migrate definitely to erpnext is the
missing feature of bank reconciliation (import ofx).
I have a python code written for odoo that does all the import process.
Does it help on implementation for erpnext?
I heard about the possibility to finance that implementation, but, how
much? What would be the cost (an idea) to implement it?
Thanks
Em 16 de jul de 2017 16:29, "rodrigoscoelho" notifications@github.com
escreveu:
It already exists a international standard on file format, the ofx files.
Better than csv. What do you think?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/issues/5903#issuecomment-315631287,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGl5mu7UETocMLU4RcBEWgnl3o0RzuIzks5sOmSIgaJpZM4JXDyL
.
took a quick look at OFX and it seems like a better standard to follow, then have localization teams build CSV > OFX converters. found this which converts SG bank csv to OFX
https://basilsalad.com/how-to/how-to-import-data-from-singaporean-banks/
So the issue with singapore bank CSVs is that they put vendor name in the 'description' fields, and im sure there are many different formats and methods different banks use to generate their CSV.
@rodrigoscoelho could you share your code? If it calls the create journal entries in odoo, the part where the OFX format is converted to objects would be useful in creating the ERPNext module.
Here the OFXparser library for python
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/ofxparse/0.14
and attached follows the OFX importer for ODOO 10.0, using this library.
ofx.zip
Who has knowledge in programming to adapt this ??
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:15 AM, hansel notifications@github.com wrote:
took a quick look at OFX and it seems like a better standard to follow,
then have localization teams build CSV > OFX converters. found this which
converts SG bank csv to OFXhttps://basilsalad.com/how-to/how-to-import-data-from-singaporean-banks/
So the issue with singapore bank CSVs is that they put vendor name in the
'description' fields, and im sure there are many different formats and
methods different banks use to generate their CSV.@rodrigoscoelho https://github.com/rodrigoscoelho could you share your
code? If it calls the create journal entries in odoo, the part where the
OFX format is converted to objects would be useful in creating the ERPNext
module.—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/issues/5903#issuecomment-315660858,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGl5mqGaHL8bSpGTRdYGtknxUXQM-Kl8ks5sOtG1gaJpZM4JXDyL
.
Just looked and my US based bank supports this OFX format as well. They call it Microsoft OFX. I assume that is the same thing. This is looking really good!
It is an international standard.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Financial_Exchange
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 5:14 PM, James Robertson notifications@github.com
wrote:
Just looked and my US based bank supports this OFX format as well. They
call it Microsoft OFX. I assume that is the same thing. This is looking
really good!—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/issues/5903#issuecomment-315869479,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGl5mnevHGdO1jCD15lHBP36lbq6Aq5iks5sO8C7gaJpZM4JXDyL
.
@rodrigoscoelho you mentioned an attachment? think you forgot to attach it
ofx.zip
I'm sorry, here it goes
@rodrigoscoelho send an email to [email protected] to get a better idea of what it would cost to have this implemented through their paid feature development program. https://erpnext.com/pricing/paid-feature-development
This issue and #2184 are basically the same thing. Would it be better to close 2184 and consolidate all discussion to this issue?
I don't know if this is the master discussion for bank reconciliation. I was studying the forums posts recently, and it is evident that an "upload bank statement" feature is essential. Most here mention how the .OFX standard is widely used. I agree with this for certain countries. However, where we do business, banks go only so far as to give you a .CSV. (Please see this link in Wikipedia, where it is clear that OFX is still not supported much.) Given this lack of true standardization, I believe that the logic behind the Bank Reconciliation tool should be like this:
2.1 The logic for matching by reference number should ideally contain some loose validation, for example:
As the reference number on the ERPNext entry, I enter this: "Bank E-pay #429" for $1,000
The bank statement has this for reference: "0001287429 for $1,000.00
Thus, the software should be able to discern that the bank reference number with 429 at the end really refers to my "Bank E-pay #429". This should enhance the amount of transactions that match by Reference number
2.2 The logic for matching by amount should also contain some loose validation, for example:
As the amount on ERPNext entry I have a float of 1,000.000
The bank statement amount has an float with two decimal points: 1,000.00
or the bank statement just returns an integer, without formatting comma: 1000
or the bank statement returns a float with different formatting: 1.000,00 (even though our standard might be #,###.##)
ERPNext should be able to discern that this transaction is the same given the amount.
2.3 The logic for matching by date should also contain loose validation, for example:
As the posting date in ERPNext I have October 4, 2017
The bank statement has a clearance date of October 13, 2017
The logic of ERPNext should infer that by having an October 13 date, the probability of the bank transaction being the same than the ERPNext registered transaction should be much higher.
Now, If you combine all these three "logic" elements, validating each bank statement transaction with Reference Number, Amount and Date, each gives more weight for a higher probability of being a match, and thus this ends up "confirming" the transaction as a match ("All those transactions listed on the bank statement that have 50% or more matching probability with ERPnext transaction, must then be matching transactions. This will enhance the user experience, and simplify the work, and just add any unmatched transactions and have them in a changed color or formatting (red, orange, etc.), so the user can breeze through reconciliations.
@Tropicalrambler This is an excellent flow. I was also looking into OFX. I think this is a good candidate for the new List Grid View that Faris has been working on.
Other suggestions that my treasurer has shared with me to ease the Reconciliation:
This last suggestion arises from the fact that most of our posting dates are for bank wire transfers (most of our transactions are electronic, and posted on ERPNext the same day they are processed), thus, this reduces the time in entering the clearance date on the Bank Reconciliation screen.
Most helpful comment
It is an international standard.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Financial_Exchange
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 5:14 PM, James Robertson notifications@github.com
wrote: