Danger: Idea: Move from ruby-git to rugged

[JuanitoFatas]

Replace our git-related stuff to rugged. It will be more reliable and we got full control thanks to libgit2. But it is gonna be a lot of work 😱 and some time to study how to use rugged

[marcelofabri]

I think we already been there: https://github.com/danger/danger/pull/77

[JuanitoFatas]

I think we already been there: #77

Ahhhh thanks for the tip! So from the history, already from Git -> Rugged -> Grit -> Git again.

And rugged was abandoned because Rugged requires CMake + Native Extensions which do not work by default on OS X.

[orta]

👯‍♂️ 👯

[orta]

I'm not _adverse to it_ BTW - we have a _lot_ more testing infrastructure in place now, so the transition is possible, think there was problems installing rugged on CIs though as it required native modules

[KrauseFx]

@orta What about 💃?

[orta]

I'm experimenting with more emojis ☠️