Cura: [3.6.0] Infill layer thickness gap bug

[Levious]

Application Version
3.6.0

Platform
MacOS Mojave 10.14

Printer
Custom ULTI

Steps to Reproduce
Layer height - 0.05
Infill layer thickness - 0.2

Actual Results
Big gap between infill and wall

Expected results
No gap

Additional Information
I changed the infill overlap from 10% to 80% and the result did not change. For the experiment, I tried the same model on the same settings in the simpliify - everything was fine.
Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong somewhere?
If the thickness of the layer coincides with the thickness of the infill - everything is ok. If not, a gap appears.

10% overlap

80% overlap

Update 23.02.18
I tried all infill types and in all the problem remains. Attached to the walls only filling type "lines" without "connect infill lines". Also in 9/9 cases different people have the same bug in version 3.6.0. We have not had time to check other versions yet.

[smartavionics]

Hello @Levious, please zip up and attach a project that exhibits this problem. Thanks.

[Levious]

Hello @Levious, please zip up and attach a project that exhibits this problem. Thanks.

You can create any simple object like a cube or cylinder and see this bug. I attach my project. Thank.
Just 20 box.3mf.zip

At the moment I learned to solve this problem like this: filling - lines, connect infill lines - no, combing - in filling. This is inconvenient but at least it works.

[smartavionics]

Hello @Levious , that's not a project file, it only contains the model. Please do File -> Save to create a project file that also contains your settings. Thanks.

[Levious]

Hello @Levious , that's not a project file, it only contains the model. Please do File -> Save to create a project file that also contains your settings. Thanks.

Just 20 box.3mf.zip

[smartavionics]

Hello @Levious , I have fixed this issue for most of the infill types and will submit a PR so that the fix can be incorporated in Ultimaker's Cura sometime in the future. Thanks for the bug report.

[smartavionics]

[Ghostkeeper]

Good find!

[Block137]

Any temporary workaround for this?

Appears to affect support as well, I have a problem where PVA interface does not adhere to PLA support infill.

[Block137]

Can we(users) expect this fix to be in next release?

My current workaround is to half the line width and double the flow rate.

[smartavionics]

Yes, unless some problem is discovered, it will be in 4.4.

You can already benefit from this fix if you are using one of my builds which you can find at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/s43vqzmi4d2bqe2/AAADdYdSu9iwcKa0Knqgurm4a?dl=0.

[Ghostkeeper]

Yes, it's merged for 4.4.