@baryluk
I ran it again, now I get:
GE - - - FAILED
SZ - - - FAILED
VD - - - FAILED
Can you add a verbose option, to show where it fails? Does that make sense?
VD does work. You can see it working here: https://www.functor.xyz/covid_19/scrapers/outputs/2020-03-23T21%3A05%2B01%3A00.txt for example Some sites like to block sometimes IP addresses.
SZ doesn't work , and can't be fixed sorry.
GE just got broken, due to change in PDF format from GE. I am working on it.
Thx.
Verbose option to print more details makes sense. I already started working on it some time ago to log details.
@baryluk ok, thank you Sir! 馃殌馃馃毃- I will keep testing.
... and SZ and FR have very old data. I have requested an update via email, but no reaction until now. Does someone have contacts that we can use?
I see these unconfirmed numbers:
FR | 202 | 4
SZ | 73 | 0
Should we add these and ask for confirmation?
GE got fixed in d7a172fa707528ddc3448b50f2dcd6cd31a667de
@zukunft I'm on both SZ and FR.
FR told me they will put numbers online starting from today (see #129)
I wrote to KFS regarding numbers for SZ and they told me that my request has been forwarded to "Amt f眉r Gesundheit und Soziales", so let's see if they will answer.
Thanks for the support. I got the same answer from SZ. I think, GE is a good reference. Looks like they have an efficient setup.
Little update about different sources: https://www.watson.ch/schweiz/gesundheit/220460287-warum-die-zahlen-zum-coronavirus-in-der-schweiz-so-unterschiedlich-sind
@zdavatz Please don't put different cantons issues into same issue on github next time. It really makes things way more harder to track. Same with https://github.com/openZH/covid_19/issues/132 . It also prevents us closing issues automatically via commits that fixes one thing, but not the other.
Ok!
@zdavatz can you close this issue? SZ has it's own now (incl. data link) and so does FR (not very succesful so far) so I think this is all taken care of.
Ok, closing now, thank you!