What steps did you take and what happened:
Recently we are observing an increasing number of failures in E2E conformance tests labeled as [Serial] e.g.
This is due to the fact that in our E2E test framework we are running tests in parallel 5 ginkgo nodes.
So now we have two options:
I would like to hear other opinions as well before proceeding with the change.
Personally, I'm +1 to choose option 2, given that:
@vincepri @CecileRobertMichon @randomvariable @detiber opinions?
Environment:
/kind bug
/area testing
/milestone v0.4.0
+1 to skip the serial tests, although would like to hear from others that have more experience in this area
we are skipping these in kubeadm tests.
serial tests are meant to run in a separate less-freq job (and it's going to be slow..)
/help
/good-first-issue
To fix this add ginkgo.skip: \[Serial\] to https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/blob/master/test/e2e/data/kubetest/conformance.yaml, send a PR, and then check the output of conformance tests after triggering /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main; no tests labeled [Serial] should be there for the latest run...
@fabriziopandini:
This request has been marked as suitable for new contributors.
Please ensure the request meets the requirements listed here.
If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed
by commenting with the /remove-good-first-issue command.
In response to this:
/help
/good-first-issueTo fix this add
ginkgo.skip: \[Serial\]to https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/blob/master/test/e2e/data/kubetest/conformance.yaml, send a PR, and then check the output of conformance tests after triggering/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main; no tests labeled [Serial] should be there for the latest run...
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
@fabriziopandini I can test it locally and send a patch with suggested changes.
/assign