Caseflow: Add Assigned to for AMA/RAMP appeals

[laurjpeterson]

When Lit Support is trying to understand the story of an appeal so they can answer status/congressional inquiries, they want to see who at the Board currently has responsibility for the appeal, so they can complete their investigation.

AC

• Populate the CSS ID of the user who currently has the appeal in the Assigned to column of the Case list for AMA appeals.

[lowellrex]

If there is no attorney assigned to an appeal (or if the attorney has already drafted a decision or requested OMO), then display the CSS ID or organization name of the entity with most immediate responsibility for the appeal (most-nested child task, tie-breaking on most recently created if need be).

[lowellrex]

After chatting with @laurjpeterson the final criteria should actually just be whoever has the most recent open task for an appeal.

@laurjpeterson if there are no open tasks for an appeal (case hasn't been distributed or the decision has been dispatched) what should this "assigned to" field read?

[laurjpeterson]

Good q. Some ideas below:

Option 1: Continue with VACOLS-like conventions for now:

• Case hasn't been distributed: Display case storage or something like that
• Case has been dispatched: Display N/A (this isn't like VACOLS, but since there are no more VACOLS locations that represent history status suggesting N/A)

Option 2: We come up with our own terms

• Case hasn't been distributed: Display Pre-distribution
• Case has been dispatched: Post-decision

[lowellrex]

I like Case storage for cases that haven't been distributed yet because it is language folks already know, and I think Post decision is slightly preferable to N/A since the former is a little more precise about what state the case is in.

[laurjpeterson]

Sounds good - let’s go with that! @sneha-pai, @cmgiven, or Amanda might have opinions to change it down the line, but I think we can go with these terms for now to get this out there