In making sites and apps on carto.js, I'd like to get really fast text-based search results from a few of the columns in my data. This is important because people use our site for a lot of searching over lots of data and I'd like to make their experience better.
From experience, I'd need to get them down to the tens of milliseconds by adding pgtrgm indices to specific columns. But if there's a way we can get these really-fast LIKE queries to work using an already built-in index, I'd love to explore that as well.
@inigomedina @rochoa
Worth noting that extensions like fuzzystrmatch and pg_trgrm are available on RDS. That kind of means "AWS has vetted these for local security issues and is fine w/ it"
I'm surprised we haven't had a little push from folks wanting pg_crypto as well, for app-building stuff. Encrypted-at-rest is a pretty useful standard to have for a PaaS
This will be useful for us because we have a few typeahead search features that require pg_trgrm
It is unclear to me what's being requested here. Is this a feature? or just a request to enable a bunch of PG extensions?
If it is a feature, it will require some definition work: UX/UI, limits and the like.
I think it鈥檚 just the latter, a request to enable the pg_trgrm Postgres extension on Carto accounts.
Yes, the request is
@pramsey is this something the RT can handle (max of 2-day work by a backender)?
The PL/PGSQL piece in cartodb-postgres is very easy, no problem for RT. The piece of making sure that the extension is in fact built and installed in all the instances, RT can at least investigate and see what the state-of-play is, but if the answer is "no, it's not built and installed" then changing that could take a while.
Roger that. @Algunenano can you have a quick look?
Both pg_trgrm and fuzzystrmatch seems to be built with our 9.5 release:

Same for the 10.1 servers:

@pramsey Do you know if there is any drawback to enabling it for all users or is it preferable to do it on demand (CDB_Enable_Extension with a whitelist)?
Well, it'll be installed per-database. Once we start letting people enable it, we're basically locked into supporting it forever, as database dumps will reference it. I think enabling it per-database is fine, it makes sense that a whole org should be able to use it, once it's turned on. Probably for orgs, we want only the org admin to be able to run the enabling function.
Moving this to ENGINE kanban @dgaubert and summoning @inigomedina because this is also a product decision. Feel free to open a new issue to start an internal discussion.
Stale issue. Closing 馃憢
Most helpful comment
Worth noting that extensions like fuzzystrmatch and pg_trgrm are available on RDS. That kind of means "AWS has vetted these for local security issues and is fine w/ it"