Currently we're sanitizing every html contents by default. But using some html tags, like <img>, are quite common. So we can provide three option like the old app.
If you really want this, please click :+1: then we prioritize this issue.
I'd vote for something like "sanitize only dangerous". I think, at a minimum, the basics should be allowed: headings, link, image, bold, italic, underline, etc. They should also be allowed inline (for instance: here is text that is <u>under</u>lined)
I agree with you. The second option should be default. I'll update the body.
Sanitize only dangerous contents(XSS) (default)
I agree.
to me it is mostly important to have my existing notes from the old app being correctly represented.
it's not something I essentially need otherwise. I don't understand why there are 3 options presented to the user. Is there really the need for the user to have control over this?
it's not something I essentially need otherwise. I don't understand why there are 3 options presented to the user. Is there really the need for the user to have control over this?
Good point. Now I'm thinking to provide the 2nd option only. Then I guess we could know the demands for the last options.
I agree that we definitely need to be able to enter HTML tags into the Markdown and have them rendered correctly. Indeed, Markdown is predicated on this. Not being able to use tags in the Markdown to manage behaviour that isn't covered by it, such as font colouring, strikeththrough, etc., would be a major limitation.
I found this issue by searching for why the folding block syntax isn't working properly. Will this issue solve that?
@techbecca I imagine it will.
@Rokt33r As per this comment on PR 561, does Boost Note support HTML tables in notes?
I haven't been able to get it to work properly. The editor correctly identifies the syntax and highlights it, but the live preview does not render it. HTML exports also have the same issue.
Platform: macOS 10.15.6 (19G2021)
Boost Note version: 0.9.0

@merovingienne HTML tables are not supported as they can be fully created using the markdown format. If there is a large demand for the feature then it's something we will consider.
(Also feel free to create a new issue with the feature request for HTML table tag support.)
@Flexo013 thank you for the response!
My use case is to have a list of items within a table cell. This can be easily achieved with HTML tags in old Boostnote, and I was confused by the comment that all HTML tags allowed on GitHub are supported.
Cool, I'll create a new issue :)
Most helpful comment
I agree that we definitely need to be able to enter HTML tags into the Markdown and have them rendered correctly. Indeed, Markdown is predicated on this. Not being able to use tags in the Markdown to manage behaviour that isn't covered by it, such as font colouring, strikeththrough, etc., would be a major limitation.