Azure-docs: Is OCSP supported in azure api management? How does certificate revocation verify work?

Created on 14 Sep 2020  Â·  5Comments  Â·  Source: MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs

There is question on this page https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/35369

The provided reply doesn't answer whether OCSP or CRL is supported. 

Is it possible to use a user define CRL and feed that when verify performed?


Document Details

⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

Pri2 api-managemensvc awaiting-product-team-response cxp product-question triaged

Most helpful comment

@morteza54dp , @mike-urnun-msft OCSP/CRL validation takes place by default if validated certificate contains corresponding urls in its extensions. There's no way to provide additional CRL urls.

All 5 comments

@morteza54dp, Thank you for your feedback! We will review and update as appropriate.

Hi @solankisamir Could you share your insights on this issue?

@morteza54dp , @mike-urnun-msft OCSP/CRL validation takes place by default if validated certificate contains corresponding urls in its extensions. There's no way to provide additional CRL urls.

Thanks for the reply.
Is OCSP responder uri mentioned in the root CA used or from the client certificate? or whether both are supported?

cc: @maksimkim for the follow-up question above

@MortezaDamavandpeyma-TomTom Since the discussion is outside of the scope of this documentation and this channel is more for driving improvements towards MS Docs, we'll now proceed to close the issue for now. While you're welcome to continue the discussion here with @maksimkim, in the future, please consider posting any product related questions on our new Q&A platform and we'd be happy to assist you there as well.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

jebeld17 picture jebeld17  Â·  3Comments

ianpowell2017 picture ianpowell2017  Â·  3Comments

spottedmahn picture spottedmahn  Â·  3Comments

Agazoth picture Agazoth  Â·  3Comments

behnam89 picture behnam89  Â·  3Comments