Apparently in Anki Desktop it is possible to select what note fields to use in the browser view?
In AnkiDroid this seemingly should be a feature in the Note Editor, where users may select which fields will be used by Card Browser for the note?
Reported on the mailing list by @anthropos888
I guess you're talking about the browser card templates for front and back? These are used in our libanki but we don't provide any way to change them, that's desktop only atm.
I just had another user ask for essentially this, and it looks like you can select which field you want to use in the Card Browser, you just need to use Deck Picker -> (options menu) Manage Note Types -> long-tap a field and select it to use for sorting.
@timrae this area is new for me, but if I'm understanding this correctly this is not a bug then? And @Anthropos888 you would have the functionality you're looking for...
No, these are two different functions. The one you just discovered can be found in Anki desktop in the note editior (ctrl-n) > fields > sort using this field. Similar as in AnkiDroid.
The function I described can be found in Anki desktop in note editor > cards > then in the template editor click "more..." button in the bottom right > browser view
Here you can set fields to be shown in the card browser (both AnkiDroid and Anki) for "Front" and "Back"
That is an essential feature if someones decks have complex front and back sides (like me) because then AnkiDroid shows a lot of nonsense (contents of styling html tags and so one) for the front and back sides in browser
I'd like to take this on. Ref: https://docs.ankiweb.net/#/templates/styling?id=browser-appearance
This only needs a UI and editing, the Card Browser already handles the override if set in AnkiDesktop.
Design:
New Activity: TemplateBrowserAppearanceActivity
Accept/Cancel button
Output
Questions:
Just as a side note: the "browser appearance" feature as been requested multiple times through the mail list recently.
yeah, we fixed a bug on image/sound tag parsing which meant the card browser reliably shows the file names, which is good because we're parsing them correctly but bad because people don't like it. This one is unfortunately stacked up behind some other stuff (#5151 as well as a little work slowdown as I prep to cut the 2.10 release branch off from master)
I just saw that the browser appearance feature is already implemented. Haha, you guys are too fast, I can't keep up with all the recent changes :-) Thanks for your great work!
@Anthropos888 More than happy to help! Thank you 馃榾
Most helpful comment
I just saw that the browser appearance feature is already implemented. Haha, you guys are too fast, I can't keep up with all the recent changes :-) Thanks for your great work!