Animate.css: [Feature Request] I think we need old version documentation

[rizkiandrianto]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Yes, really hard to find friendly old class documentation.

Describe the solution you'd like We need old documentation page, that we can copy paste v3 css class.

Describe alternatives you've considered At least we had old README.

Additional context old https://daneden.github.io/animate.css/.

[eltonmesquita]

Hi @rizkiandrianto, sorry, but why the need for the old docs? The new one is based on the last one, with a few more additions. The usage, besides the class prefix, is basically the same. There's also the complete list of animations in the first part of the demo-site.

I honestly can't see why to keep both versions. But I'll keep this open to hear more about the request.

[3epnm]

I have to agree with @rizkiandrianto. I use animate.css in version 3.0 - and it has changed a bit - however small this change may be. In itself, it is good practice to document the legacy versions of an excellent product. At least I don't feel any pain for an update.

[WarenGonzaga]

@eltonmesquita alright let's do it ;) thanks @3epnm and @rizkiandrianto for the suggestion.

[eltonmesquita]

It's added to the readme now. I think there's no need to add this to the website as there never was any docs in the website.

[PeterPan73]

http://web.archive.org/web/20191129075511/https://daneden.github.io/animate.css/