Adguardfilters: mediamarkt.nl

Created on 28 Sep 2019  路  18Comments  路  Source: AdguardTeam/AdguardFilters

Issue URL (Incorrect Blocking)

https://www.mediamarkt.nl/nl/category/_televisies-450682.html

Comment

Username: @worldsdream

Screenshots


Screenshot 1

Screenshot 1



Screenshot 2

Screenshot 2

System configuration

Information | value
--- | ---
Platform: | Win
AdGuard version: | 7.2
Browser: | Firefox
AdGuard driver: | WFP
Stealth mode options: | Hide your search queries, Send Do-Not-Track header, Remove X-Client-Data header from HTTP requests, Strip URLs from tracking parameters, Self-destructing third-party cookies (180), Block WebRTC, Block Push API, Block Location API, Block Flash, Block Java
Filters: | AdGuard Base,
AdGuard Tracking Protection,
AdGuard Dutch,
AdGuard Annoyances

AdGuard for Windows Medium Incorrect Blocking

All 18 comments

@mapx-:

@@||www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js$script,domain=www.mediamarkt.nl

Redirect to neutralized resource does not help...

it's an annoyance filter, for example fanboy's cookie list:

add
#@#.cookie-info-modal

(already fixed by AdGuard Annoyances filter)

@ryanbr

@mapx- You are telling that it's already fixed by AG annoyance.

I have only the following filters and it does not work:
AdGuard Base,AdGuard Tracking Protection,AdGuard Dutch,AdGuard Annoyances

This is broken by AdGuard Tracking Protection:

https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardFilters/blob/680fac91e145010944d5c48a444d23d7c10c2df2/SpywareFilter/sections/specific.txt#L338

I am able reproduce with Polish Internet Service Provider.

Similar filter exsist in EasyList Privacy.

Which rule should I apply so I can test if it works?

Like this:

@@||www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?$script,domain=www.mediamarkt.nl

@krystian3w I did, does not work =(

For my is enough, maybe I need retest with AdGuard for Windows and your setup.

Or try this:

@@||mediamarkt.nl^$jsinject
@@||googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?$script,domain=mediamarkt.nl

jsinject is similar to ##+js() exception for disable all scriplet injections:

https://kb.adguard.com/en/general/how-to-create-your-own-ad-filters#jsinject-modifier

well, I'm using uBo and the exception above is working for me

I added both rules. Not working.

https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardFilters/issues/41374#issuecomment-536227935 - I don't know how popular UBO is in the Netherlands but you can overtake EasyList and help the Dutch.

UBO, APB and AG are popular. I have used Easylist in the past. I switched to AG filters because the maintainers of the AG filterlist are better. Let's see if @BlazDT or @AdamWr or @Alex-302 will solve it.

@krystian3w that is the correct rule. Fixed.
Repo maintainers please check the fixed rule by @krystian3w

Thank you @krystian3w

Popups based on colorbox are very problematic: https://github.com/PolishFiltersTeam/PolishAnnoyanceFilters/issues/1324

I removed problematic rule from Dutch filter, update available in about 3 hours.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

adguard-bot picture adguard-bot  路  3Comments

adguard-bot picture adguard-bot  路  3Comments

adguard-bot picture adguard-bot  路  3Comments

adguard-bot picture adguard-bot  路  3Comments

THEtomaso picture THEtomaso  路  3Comments