Lets work towards elasticsearch 5, from both a functionality perspective and also a classpath-dodging one. For example, our server is used as a base for others. We need to be careful about class conflicts with ES libraries, and as always guava.
Here's a note about status quo on elasticsearch-http and ES5 from @sethp-jive
Fairly well – they got rid of the string data type (I think we want keyword, since we're treating ES as a big String.equals engine and not doing "full text" search), but with a few changes I can get many of the tests to pass. The rest fail because ES goes into overdrive and pegs my CPU without returning any results within 10 seconds. The errors it does log suggest I've missed some important fields (i.e. "traceId" is still "text" and not "keyword"), but I stopped there for now.
cc @openzipkin/elasticsearch ps I've started resurrecting my old okhttp work towards this. The client design that @sethp-jive made makes it much lighter effort.
I'm personally interested in an okhttp option for a number of reasons:
I've completed the okhttp storage layer for elasticsearch 2.x (haven't looked into 5.x portability, yet). I've also written a tracing interceptor so that we can debug the performance.
https://github.com/openzipkin/brave/pull/242
After I get an okhttp aws signature v4 interceptor together, I'll raise a pull request. should be tomorrow or next day. here's a peek for now.

I'm looking into this today, since ES is out
currently, the biggest problem is an artificial one (the default lookback being equal to endTs).
In the current implementation, daily buckets are listed individually, so during tests this ends up looking for 15K daily indexes, which pretty much crashes the ES server.
index problem is sorted. next up is how we do aggregations when using 128-bit trace IDs, considering ES5 has caveats on string fields https://github.com/openzipkin/zipkin/issues/1379
now does zipkin 1.14 version support es 5 ? i want to upgrade cassandra to es 5.
Most helpful comment
cc @openzipkin/elasticsearch ps I've started resurrecting my old okhttp work towards this. The client design that @sethp-jive made makes it much lighter effort.
I'm personally interested in an okhttp option for a number of reasons: