Thank you
Hello @blinkbink, thank you for your interest in our work! Please visit our Custom Training Tutorial to get started, and see our Jupyter Notebook , Docker Image, and Google Cloud Quickstart Guide for example environments.
If this is a bug report, please provide screenshots and minimum viable code to reproduce your issue, otherwise we can not help you.
If this is a custom model or data training question, please note Ultralytics does not provide free personal support. As a leader in vision ML and AI, we do offer professional consulting, from simple expert advice up to delivery of fully customized, end-to-end production solutions for our clients, such as:
For more information please visit https://www.ultralytics.com.
You don’t need to resize them manually. It just works which is great.
I don’t know if there’s a “perfect” image size to use. It should be up to your experiment.
i took a dataset with 4k and trained with 640, however, it seems like I need to use --img-size=3840 with detect.py to detect correctly, anyway to get the best performance for any size?
@luvwinnie train and detect at the same --img-size for best results.
@glenn-jocher how about the size on training data but with base width is 640, i mean the base width is 640 but have various height like 320x640, 480x640, 221x640, so just can resize by width, not both height and width, because if i resize with same size 640x640 got strecth image
@blinkbink train and detect at the same --img-size for best results, such as the default --img 640.
yes sorry, i don't understand, i mean --image-size 640 is for 640x640 right ? how about various like 480x640, 320x640, 211x640 ?
@blinkbink you only supply the longest dimension, --img 640. The rest is handled automatically.
Most helpful comment
@luvwinnie train and detect at the same --img-size for best results.