Do you want to request a _feature_ or report a _bug_?
Feature
What is the current behavior?
dependencies are always installed and there is no command to prevent that.
What is the expected behavior?
Similar to npm install --only=dev a CLI option to only install devDependencies.
(My) usecase: Compile only environments where the resulting build will be used in a docker container (with a separate yarn install)
Is this still an open request? If so, I was going to take a swing at it.
Go ahead @coreyc.
@coreyc This would be incredibly cool. I have a "helper package" which has 20-30 dependencies in production, but locally I only need two devDependencies.
Actually we are having an issue that could be solved by this feature.
We are using docker-compose with 2 services one to compile (webpack) and one to run the server (web) and a shared volume for the build output.
The issue arise because we use a .env file to pass NODE_ENV var to both services
if we set NODE_ENV=production to test production behaviour the webpack service isn't able to compile because yarn will install only dependencies.
So the solution we are adopting is this in the webpack service:
command: bash -c "NODE_ENV=development yarn && NODE_ENV=production npm run build"
It would be cool if we could specify to force install devDependencies even if NODE_ENV=production
@SharpEdgeMarshall I think this feature is slightly different than what you're talking about, but will take a look at it.
Due to holiday week, been slightly delayed but I am working on this.
I noticed after commenting that the feature requested by @peterjuras could completely solve our issue, exactly as him we have a build container and we could use ONLY devDepencies.
With --dev flag our cmd could became command: bash -c "yarn --dev && npm run build"
@SharpEdgeMarshall I ran into something similar on Heroku, which sets both NODE_ENV and NPM_CONFIG_PRODUCTION variables. I think #1975 would help your case too.
In npm, NPM_CONFIG_PRODUCTION takes precedence over NODE_ENV for whether to install devDependencies. In Yarn, it's currently the opposite.
@coreyc Thanks for the PR. Will you have time to finish it or would it be best to have someone else give it a try?
@nsgundy I had some open questions that weren't answered in the PR comments. Re-familiarizing myself with the code now. Will update the PR soon.
@nsgundy thought i could spare some time to finish this, but can't make the time. you can look at the PR, it's close to being finished anyway.
+1 would love to see this!
duplicate of https://github.com/yarnpkg/yarn/issues/3254.
Most helpful comment
Is this still an open request? If so, I was going to take a swing at it.