Worldcubeassociation.org: Do not allow delegates to submit their delegate report until results are posted

[pedrosino]

It's cool that we automatically get the number from the results, but in the event that results are not posted yet, we're stuck with "Competitors Unknown, results are not posted yet. ", which is kinda annoying.

~Two solutions:~
~- [ ] allow delegates to fill this if the results are not up~
~- [ ] once results are posted, come back and change this field~

As per the discussion below, we want to change things so it's not possible to submit the delegate report for a competition until the results have been posted.

[jfly]

I think you're under the mistaken assumption that there's actually a field in the delegate_reports table for this?

[pedrosino]

Ah, I am :(
Well, in that case I feel there should be a field for that. I remember we also discussed having the number of newcomers. As I said above, updating this once results are posted should be enough to keep information on the website correct. The discussion would be forever impaired/hindered, but we can live with that.

[jfly]

I personally don't like the idea of new fields for each of these things. What I would support is requiring delegates to upload results to the website _before_ they can post their delegate report. They wouldn't have to wait for the results team to post the results, but that would let us compute these numbers for them.

[pedrosino]

Ah, now that you say, it's not mandatory to have an actual field. It can just be updated on the report's text.
As of now, delegates don't upload results to the website (and given recent history, I'm not sure it's a good idea). I don't have a problem with allowing reports to be sent before results, since you may want to write the report when information is still fresh, while checking results can have other hiccups (missing DOBs, checking for newcomers, etc).
I'll try to take a look at the code for this and come up with a better proposal.

[jfly]

Ah, now that you say, it's not mandatory to have an actual field. It can just be updated on the report's text.

I'm not sure what you mean by this. Remember that we allow delegates to edit and save their report before posting them.

As of now, delegates don't upload results to the website (and given recent history, I'm not sure it's a good idea)

We trust them to email a json file to results@, I'm just suggesting they upload the json file to the website instead of emailing them. I'm sure there will be some unexpected pain at first, but that always happens when you change things.

I don't have a problem with allowing reports to be sent before results

I'm trying to make a distinction between a delegate _uploading_ results and a results team member _posting_ results. I suggest that we don't let a delegate post their delegate report until after they have uploaded their results (so we can compute the number of competitors).

since you may want to write the report when information is still fresh, while checking results can have other hiccups (missing DOBs, checking for newcomers, etc).

For sure, that's why we let you work on your report before, during, and after your competition. Just because you've written a report doesn't mean you have to post it immediately. That said, this is mostly superceded by my last response distinguishing between uploading and posting results.

[pedrosino]

Ah, now that you say, it's not mandatory to have an actual field. It can just be updated on the report's text.

I'm not sure what you mean by this. Remember that we allow delegates to edit and save their report before posting them.

Sorry, I meant "updated once results are posted (and after the report is posted)".

As of now, delegates don't upload results to the website (and given recent history, I'm not sure it's a good idea)

We trust them to email a json file to results@, I'm just suggesting they upload the json file to the website instead of emailing them. I'm sure there will be some unexpected pain at first, but that always happens when you change things.

I know, but sometimes we have to ask them for a new json file...I'm not sure if this ever affected total number of competitors, but probably affected newcomers in some occasion.

I don't have a problem with allowing reports to be sent before results

I'm trying to make a distinction between a delegate uploading results and a results team member posting results. I suggest that we don't let a delegate post their delegate report until after they have uploaded their results (so we can compute the number of competitors).

Ok, this sounds reasonable. The nagging about the report is not done yet, right? It would be more than necessary in case we don't allow posting the report before results.

since you may want to write the report when information is still fresh, while checking results can have other hiccups (missing DOBs, checking for newcomers, etc).

For sure, that's why we let you work on your report before, during, and after your competition. Just because you've written a report doesn't mean you have to post it immediately. That said, this is mostly __superseded__ by my last response distinguishing between uploading and posting results.

[UnsolvedCypher]

Now that results are uploaded directly to the WCA website, it should be possible to require Delegates to do this upload before submitting the report so that the numbers can be computed properly.

[jfly]

I agree! @viroulep, sorry, I still have not caught up on your posting results work, but is this something that could make sense to do now?

[SAuroux]

It should be kept in mind that what the delegate uploads are just "temporary" results (pre-WRT), while the current number of competitors for competition reports is taken from final results (post-WRT).

However, I can confirm that the number of competitors matches for >= 95% of these results and devitations of more than 1-2 people are extremely rare.

[jfly]

Good point, @SAuroux . It might be worth adding a parenthetical if this number is not yet WCA-official.

[timreyn]

Is it a big deal if the two numbers differ by 1-2? I don't think it matters enough to be worth a parenthetical.

[viroulep]

I won't add anything to #3127 anymore, but I believe it would be quite simple, on the delegate report page, to look for inboxresults for the current competition if results are not posted yet :)

[AlbertoPdRF]

Based on @viroulep's last comment, I'm labeling this one as a good first issue.

We would still have the problem of Delegates submitting the Delegate Report before they upload the results though. However, to not allow this to happen, we should ask for others' opinions!

[EdHollingdale]

I think this is an important issue and is the reason I wait for results to be posted before submitting the report. The number of competitors provides a lot of context about the competition. I don't think it is unreasonable to have to submit results before submitting the report. After all, it could be during the results checking and submission process that new incidents are discovered.

[AlbertoPdRF]

@thewca/board would you agree with requiring the results for a competition to be uploaded before being able to submit the report?

[Epride]

I agree here, this also forces the Delegate to focus on results rather than report which is far more important IMO

[cubewhiz]

I'm fine with that. I don't feel strongly about it.

[Nanush7]

It happens that you need help, for example, with a provisional extra. Do you think it's better to post the results before the report and then you just request the change for that particular case?

[Jambrose777]

It happens that you need help, for example, with a provisional extra. Do you think it's better to post the results before the report and then you just request the change for that particular case?

Yes that’s correct. The delegate should use their best judgement for which result to submit and based on the feedback submit any change requests as needed.