Website: Update language/zh base branch from release-1.14 to release-1.15

Created on 14 Aug 2019 · 12Comments · Source: kubernetes/website

Similar to what we did with release-1.12 to release-1.14. I would like that we can do something similar after release-1.15 rollout.

Relates to #13745

/cc @kubernetes/sig-docs-zh-owners @kubernetes/sig-docs-zh-reviews
/cc @zacharysarah

languagzh prioritimportant-longterm

Source

chenrui333

Most helpful comment

looks like it's time to stop using release-x.y branches as the base branch.

tengqm 11:59 AM
during 1.17 release window, the Chinese localization has been a headache for the release team.
we had a lot of commits directly merged into release-1.16 and only release-1.16 branch
when the release team rebase things back to release-1.16 branch, they saw a lot of conflicts
going forward, maybe we should commit things to master directly since we are kinda catching up with the master branch

idealhack 1:40 PM
agreed, PR to master or a -dev branch

https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/CE3LNFYJ1/p1575946765043800

idealhack on 10 Dec 2019

👍2

All 12 comments

/language zh
/priority important-longterm

sftim on 11 Sep 2019

/s/release-1.15/release-1.16
/s/release-1.14/release-1.15

idealhack on 11 Sep 2019

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

fejta-bot on 10 Dec 2019

looks like it's time to stop using release-x.y branches as the base branch.

tengqm 11:59 AM
during 1.17 release window, the Chinese localization has been a headache for the release team.
we had a lot of commits directly merged into release-1.16 and only release-1.16 branch
when the release team rebase things back to release-1.16 branch, they saw a lot of conflicts
going forward, maybe we should commit things to master directly since we are kinda catching up with the master branch

idealhack 1:40 PM
agreed, PR to master or a -dev branch

https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/CE3LNFYJ1/p1575946765043800

idealhack on 10 Dec 2019

👍2

Since we're changing the process a little, @chenrui333 or @tengqm can you please add /cc @kubernetes/sig-docs-en-owners on the next switch to master or dev-x.xx? It will help keep everyone in sync!

Thanks @idealhack and @tengqm!

jimangel on 11 Dec 2019

/remove-lifecycle stale

jimangel on 11 Dec 2019

Sure, @jimangel, will keep an eye on it.

tengqm on 11 Dec 2019

cc @kubernetes/sig-docs-zh-owners @kubernetes/sig-docs-zh-reviews ^^^^

idealhack on 11 Dec 2019

this issue is old . can we close this?
/cc @chenrui333

tanjunchen on 6 Mar 2020

pretty old issue. irrelevant now.
/close

tengqm on 1 Jun 2020

👍1

@tengqm: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

pretty old issue. irrelevant now.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.