This is a...
Problem:
Only AWS and OpenStack configurations are documented. There is no documentation available on how to set up clusters with other providers such as Azure, EC2, or vSphere.
Proposed Solution:
Create the documentation, even beta engineer-style documentation from those that tested those cloud providers before activating them.
Page to Update:
https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/cluster-administration/cloud-providers/
/cc @hogepodge
DigitalOcean will be adding docs for this soon
wg-cloud-provider, in collaboration with sig-docs, is formulating a general way to handle this issue. The cloud-provider group is working on setting documentation standards for the providers that will do a few things:
Currently wg-cloud-provider is investigation transitioning to a SIG, and converting the existing SIG-
The end goal is to provide a positive and consistent user experience for identifying, installing, and using any particular cloud provider.
Initial work in this PR https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/1942
Please consider known location to be docs dir under each cloud provider. Otherwise every document would have two copies.
Also posted the question here: https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/88#issuecomment-384539732
There would be a docs dir in every single provider:
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/wg-cloud-provider/cloud-provider-requirements.md
What's the relationship with the kubernetes website? Shall the document be periodly synced?
https://github.com/kubernetes/website/blob/master/docs/concepts/cluster-administration/cloud-providers.md
/cc @chenopis
/cc @jaredbhatti
FYI
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.
Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.
Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
cc @hogepodge @chenopis for updates on some progress we made during KubeCON :)
At the developer summit at KubeCon Seattle, we make plans to refocus efforts between /sig cloud-provider and /sig cluster-lifecycle to consolidate the getting started pages. The plan is for SIG-Docs to act as a high level project manager, setting goals and tasks for the corresponding SIGs to take back to their teams to accomplish. @zacharysarah did I capture that right?
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.
Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.
Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close
@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.
In response to this:
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with/reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with/remove-lifecycle rotten.Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
Most helpful comment
wg-cloud-provider, in collaboration with sig-docs, is formulating a general way to handle this issue. The cloud-provider group is working on setting documentation standards for the providers that will do a few things:
Currently wg-cloud-provider is investigation transitioning to a SIG, and converting the existing SIG- into working groups. Individual cloud-provider additions in the meantime should be caveated with those governance changes in mind.
The end goal is to provide a positive and consistent user experience for identifying, installing, and using any particular cloud provider.
Initial work in this PR https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/1942