Hi,
I'm moving a project over from browserify to webpack and hit a snag this afternoon. For arcane reasons (involving chrome and atom-shell/chromium behaviors) I need both https and http instances of local dev/testing web servers.
webpack-dev-server is awesome, but I didn't find any directly supported way to instantiate on two ports at the same time.
Here's what I ended up doing (full code context, farther down below)...
webpack_dev_server.listen(8004);
http.createServer(webpack_dev_server.app).listen (8005);
I'd like to ask whether this is a reasonable solution, or whether there's a better thing I should be doing, or alternatively whether a pull request to implement simultaneous https/http at the API level would be welcome.
Below, the full gulpfile.js chunk ...
var webpack = require ("webpack");
var WebpackDevServer = require ("webpack-dev-server");
var webpackConfig = require ("./webpack.config.js");
var http = require ('http');
gulp.task ("webpack-dev-server", function (callback) {
// modify some webpack config options
var myConfig = Object.create (webpackConfig);
myConfig.devtool = "#source-map";
myConfig.debug = true;
// Start a webpack-dev-server
var wds = new WebpackDevServer (webpack(myConfig), {
https: true,
publicPath: "/web", // + myConfig.output.publicPath,
stats: {
colors: true
}
});
wds.listen(8004);
http.createServer(wds.app).listen (8005);
});
Thank you.
Glad you found a solution, but I think the use case is too rar to add options for this to the webpack-dev-server. Even without accessing internals you could start a proxy server.
I would like to see this actually. For the command line especially.
Does this also work with websockets?
I'm constantly getting http 404 for http://localhost:3001/sockjs-node/info?t=<...> when i use http.createServer(wds.app).listen(...).
This is actually not so rare situation :+1: I need also both http and https
Redirect from http to https also would be ok
bump. i always need both environments.
is this possible yet?
@sokra Looks like this is not rare situation :smiley:
This is really not rare situation
I would also need both!
Yes please.
We need this!
I need this as well. Bump!
another +1 for this..
So a trick would be to configure nginx and open the port 80 to reroute to the actual ssecure locatio. Something like the following in your nginx configuration
server {
listen 80;
return 301 https://www.example.com$request_uri;
}
This works for me, but I would like to know If i can remove the dependency on nginx and only configure web pack.
Thanks.
For me - we need option to:
Having the option to redirect http to https would be quite helpful. Now I have to always add the https to the beginning of my development links in the browser.
+1. I am using this to test development of an app to communicate with people who are not technically sophisticated. Easier to get them to type "devsite.com" into address bar than "https://devsite.com."
Bump priority. it was a surprise to me that such a functionality is not out-of-the-box.
Now that Chrome is blocking third party cookies unless they are secure, I think this feature is more important for developer experience since it will become more common for devs to have a need for https during dev.
Most helpful comment
Redirect from http to https also would be ok