now i am seeing dupe ‘work started’ and an extra ‘new bounty’ event http://bits.owocki.com/2B2x3G1O0U3x/Screen%20Shot%202018-07-09%20at%2010.09.50%20AM.png
example issues:
1) https://gitcoin.co/issue/XLNT/gnarly/11/677
2) https://gitcoin.co/issue/raiden-network/raiden/1243/561
3) https://gitcoin.co/issue/zeppelinos/zos-cli/122/622
continuation of https://github.com/gitcoinco/web/issues/1659
@pinkiebell do you see any obvious place where in the mgmt command this could be caused?
here is the command i ran in prod
./manage.py create_activity_records --force
if you run it with --force, it clears all activities.
maybe a race condition?
@pinkiebell https://gitcoin.co/issue/XLNT/gnarly/11/677
after clearing we immediately add activities again.
Is the underlying datastore all atomic?
Can you point me to a issue with duplicates?
read the description of the ticket pls
if you set it with @transaction.atomic() it can be atomic, yes
https://gitcoin.co/issue/zeppelinos/zos-cli/122/622
same here now.
But, API response is fine:
https://gitcoin.co/actions/api/v0.1/bounties/?github_url=https://github.com/zeppelinos/zos-cli/issues/122&network=mainnet&standard_bounties_id=622
i think i see the issue
one sec ill commit up a fix
looks like the frontend makes TWO API requests
http://bits.owocki.com/042q1G263q1i/Screen%20Shot%202018-07-09%20at%2010.34.37%20AM.png
one with not_current=1 and one without that param.
what is the reason for making two API requests? i think we should only care about activites related to teh current bounty and we should migrate the actions to the current_bounty=1 when we create a new current_bounty
const render_activity = function(result, all_results) {
let all_activities = [];
(all_results || []).forEach(result => {
all_activities = all_activities.concat(result.activities);
});
let activities = process_activities(result, all_activities);
activities = activities.slice().sort(function(a, b) {
//THIS ?
return a['created_on'] < b['created_on'] ? -1 : 1;
}).reverse();
only_one_approve(activities);
here is my PR with a few fixes in it ( https://github.com/gitcoinco/web/pull/1662 ) and one outstanding question
@owocki Nice catch!
Next time I will give my network bar more room 😆
did some local testing.. merging soon
fix is in.. looks okay to me. anyone else see an issue LMK
Most helpful comment
fix is in.. looks okay to me. anyone else see an issue LMK