Web: Feedback mechanism funder + contributor for each project

[PixelantDesign]

Feedback mechanism so that funders and contributors can comment on the experience they've had working together.

[owocki]

this is a good idea

[PixelantDesign]

@mbeacom are we still considering delighted?

[thelostone-mc]

@PixelantDesign what's delighted ?

[thelostone-mc]

Since reputation would eventually be part of the system. We could us this as a means to decide the score (kinda like uber ratings which works for both the driver + rider)
In my head -> in most scenarios

Feedback form for Bounty Issuer

• Rating of Hunter
• (If rating is low -> show options like poor response , submitted work is incomplete / poor quality , others )
• Rating of Gitcoin experience (prompted once in n times)
• (If rating is low -> ask why )

Feedback form for Bounty Hunter

• Rating of Issuer
• (If rating is low -> show options like low funding, poor response , tight timelines, scope creep, others )
• Rating of Gitcoin experience (prompted once in n times)
• (If rating is low -> ask why )

It's not more than 4 touch points in worst case scenario and 2 in best case scenario
Need to figure out when to prompt the gitcoin experience question ( Cause it ends up being annoying to ask them to fill it out the gitcoin experience -> not sure how we'd go about this )

[PixelantDesign]

@thelostone-mc should we build this?

[thelostone-mc]

We can build it out now -> but it would be super effective once the reputation system is ready!
Any thoughts @SaptakS @mbeacom ?

[PixelantDesign]

I kind of prefer plug and play but not sure what it would take to get something installed.

[mbeacom]

All set via Hotjar. Dean Ramadan with marketing and the rest of the GC/CF team now have access to Hotjar.

[thelostone-mc]

Closing this cause we've got hotjar \m/