Please provide sha256 checksum and/or gpg signatures so that we can trust downloads
I second this request.
Thumbs-ups alone should suffice :-) â–¶ the opening post, thanks.
FYI, non-official (I should not ask the checksums here to be trusted):
Meta, tracking: #582
@grahamperrin thanks I've got the same sha256 for waterfox-current-2020.03.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2, how about classic though?
Having sha256sums are great, but signing is better. In any case, we need both officially from the project and/or @MrAlex94 himself....
https://github.com/grahamperrin/Waterfox/wiki/Archive-of-change-logs,-announcements-and-downloads#2020031-classic
@grahamperrin thanks again, same sha256sum for waterfox-classic-2020.03.1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2
Most helpful comment
Thumbs-ups alone should suffice :-) â–¶ the opening post, thanks.
FYI, non-official (I should not ask the checksums here to be trusted):
Meta, tracking: #582