Waterfox: I can't see Waterfox in Android Playstore
Although I have 64-bit CPU (Sony Xperia L1) I can't see Waterfox in Android Playstore neither on my phone nor on my laptop when I visit http://play.google.com/store.
- Device: Sony Xperia L1
- OS: Android
- Version 7.0
Sadi58
All 17 comments
I hope it will be 'releases' here on github though! With F-droid store!
Btw gp store is an evil ;), it injects spyware/metrics in their .apk (((.
DI555
on 20 Aug 2019
Cross references:
grahamperrin
on 4 Sep 2019
https://www.reddit.com/comments/dctx5f/-/f2c6w8n/
I've been talking to Google. Their CS is zero. There isn't much to report back 🤷♂️
grahamperrin
on 4 Oct 2019
@grahamperrin can you advise where to download legit copy of waterfox for android?
4evermaat
on 5 Oct 2019
I have no idea. Was anything relevant in Reddit? Maybe not limited to the three posts/comments linked from above.
Reddit often can't find what's required in Reddit, so be prepared to try a Google search of site:www.reddit.com/r/waterfox/
grahamperrin
on 5 Oct 2019
If anyone is referring to the 32-bit Waterfox App, the Beta version is still available on the Play Store that can only be seen/obtained by following the steps (outlined on the following post) requiring your signing up for the Beta version "first" and then you'll be able to see it on the Play Store.
https://github.com/MrAlex94/Waterfox/issues/730#issuecomment-421647220
Good Luck!
~Ibuprophen
Ibuprophen
on 18 Oct 2019
For clarity (this might be known from something in Reddit, but it's not yet clear in this issue):
- https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.waterfox.waterfox seems to present the application only if you are signed in; and if you previously installed the application.
Top left, it's truly not found:
– and with a signed in view, clicking the Installed button confirms:
This item isn't available.
For the /releases/ page link to the unavailable item:
- #582
grahamperrin
on 27 Oct 2019
I chose to unsubscribe from this because I've concluded (1) that a web browser must be multi-platform and have synchronization feature, and (2) that it must have a strong team of developers and maintainers even if it is based on Chromium or Firefox. Otherwise you tend to face numerous problems. So good-bye to Waterfox, hello to Vivaldi or Brave browser.
Sadi58
on 27 Oct 2019
@Sadi58 sorry to lose you.
Please, do not overlook Alex's comment (quoted above, https://github.com/MrAlex94/Waterfox/issues/1085#issuecomment-538193294) about zero customer support from Google; from this I assume that he has requested re-presentation of Waterfox in Google Play Store.
If – _if_ – a developer gets nothing from Google, then is it fair to question the strength of a team that's seeking support from the organisation?
Whilst I can not comment upon (have no knowledge of) details of this Waterfox case …
… I was, years before Waterfox existed, involved with a different open source project that suffered through a somewhat insane set of 'developments' to Google Groups. I'm glad to say that (after some years) things became sane but during the period when I tried, repeatedly, to explain the insanity: it was like banging my head against a brick wall. Not a rant against Google, just a factual observation …
grahamperrin
on 27 Oct 2019
Sorry to see you go, but I don’t see what’s stopping you from using one of the various Firefox mobile browsers and using the sync feature of those while using Waterfox on desktop until things are resolved?
MrAlex94
on 27 Oct 2019
@MrAlex94 Could the removal of your app be related to the presence of donation links inside the app ?
The Wireguard open source app actually got removed from the Play Store for that reason, and the Wireguard Android team actually removed all donations links from the application in order to get the app accepted back.
Miouyouyou
on 27 Oct 2019
@MrAlex94 @grahamperrin Thank you and sorry for this. This is not actually the only reason for leaving Waterfox as an alternative to the biggies like Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox. All the best...
Sadi58
on 28 Oct 2019
What about F-Droid?
smnthermes
on 3 Jan 2020
What about F-Droid?
grahamperrin
on 4 Jan 2020
still wait to see all the builds at least here in 'releases' , an free of gp services at all!
DI555
on 15 Jan 2020
Additional cross-references include:
- https://redd.it/eukvn4
- https://redd.it/faq5yb
- https://redd.it/foclzf
Some recent highlights
https://github.com/MrAlex94/Waterfox/issues/1038#issuecomment-578054148
In short, Google removed it and doesn't want to tell why.
… understand what System1 does … partnership, … know the team … the right people to help me grow Waterfox. Down to earth …
https://old.reddit.com/r/waterfox/comments/f3hi8s/privacy_browser_waterfox_appears_to_be_sold_to/fhl6crp/ with added emphasis:
… Thanks, I appreciate the rationality and also now that System1 are onboard they're helping sort out the issues with Google Play :-)
https://www.system1.com/what-we-do#applications
… newest addition, the Waterfox browser. …
grahamperrin
on 25 Mar 2020
I run a personal F-Droid repository for apps that can't or won't be accepted/submitted to the mainline F-Droid repo (usually because they include nonfree components). If @MrAlex94 is willing to package standalone APKs (preferably using the Github Releases system, but I can work with anything that uses numeric version numbers; in one case I scrape the SourceForge page and parse the HTML) I can include it in my repo.
EmberHeartshine
on 20 Oct 2020
Related issues
sutex
·
3Comments
foreachthing
·
3Comments
grahamperrin
·
4Comments
grahamperrin
·
4Comments
514guy
·
3Comments
Most helpful comment
Sorry to see you go, but I don’t see what’s stopping you from using one of the various Firefox mobile browsers and using the sync feature of those while using Waterfox on desktop until things are resolved?