Waterfox: china need Firefox Monitor!! please updata

[bAdOoWindy]

about version!

[grahamperrin]

Can you explain?

Maybe a link to something that describes your need.

Thank you

[bAdOoWindy]

https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2018/06/25/testing-firefox-monitor-a-new-security-tool/

[bAdOoWindy]

new version (not just firefox also extend ) fixed bugs,Performance improvement ,ui Customized

[grahamperrin]

Firefox Monitor

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&order=Bug%20Number&list_id=14234406&short_desc=Firefox%20Monitor&short_desc_type=substring finds three Mozilla bugs:

• 1463301 - [Shield] Opt-out Study: Firefox Monitor
• 1473132 - Package Firefox Monitor UI variations individually for user-testing
• 1475126 - Ship Firefox Monitor UI in m-c.

From 1475126, targeting Firefox 62:

… gather some opinions on how we want to ship this. The two routes I see are a) system add-on, b) bake into browser code. …

SHIELD

About SHIELD Studies | Firefox Help

Not a feature of Waterfox; https://www.reddit.com/comments/7ijjzb/-/dqzgb5h/

Cloudflare

From Mozilla's blog post:

… worked closely with HIBP and Cloudflare …

The Cloudflare blog post:

Validating Leaked Passwords with k-Anonymity

Consider:

• in the Waterfox support area, the _anti-Cloudflare_ comment above https://www.reddit.com/comments/8p4x1q/-/e1jffzc/?context=1
• the _rant_ at https://redd.it/8ixnfa (not my rant, but I did reply).

I should encourage discussion of Cloudflare at https://www.reddit.com/r/CloudFlare/ (not here in the Waterfox repository).

For Waterfox

Given the possibility of anti-Cloudflare reactions from some members of the community, there may be:

• resistance to a system add-on; and/or
• calls for baked-in Firefox code to be removed from a Waterfox that will be based on future Firefox ESR 68.

A non-system extension, maybe

Mozilla bug 1463301 began with an intention of (SHIELD) shipping to Firefox 60.

If I can get a copy of the extension, I'll try it with Waterfox 56.2.1. I imagine that it will be incompatible.

[grahamperrin]

I'll try it with Waterfox 56.2.1. I imagine that it will be incompatible.

Firefox Monitor 1.2

Waterfox 56.2.1 defaults to not check for compatibility, so the extension installs without difficulty (ignoring the strict minimum):

Permission required:

• Monitor extension usage and manage themes

Compatibility and usability

strict_min_version 61.0

Version 1 of the study ended four days ago.

Beyond 1.2

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1475126#c3 asks whether a future version of the extension might be compatible with Firefox ESR 60.

[bAdOoWindy]

Fantastic!!!