Vue: 👋 Vue reactivity engine and MobX 🖖

Created on 23 May 2018  ·  4Comments  ·  Source: vuejs/vue

Hey,

Vue is cool, over at React land MobX ( https://github.com/mobxjs/mobx/ ) takes a similar approach by defining getters/setters.

The architectural nature of Vue apps is much closer to React+MobX than the typical React architecture and MobX is used and trusted by some big companies

I am not aware of any knowledge sharing or idea sharing between the projects. I think it would be really cool if we explore possibilities to collaborate.

Some areas of collaboration which could be cool:

  • Standardized benchmarks.
  • Optimization tips and what things that worked out and didn't.
  • Good user experience for things like circular references.
  • What code can be shared between libraries or extracted.
  • Discuss the transition to from getters/setters to proxies.
  • Discuss what's hard from the language PoV to provide feedback to TC39.

I am explicitly not suggesting anything concrete. Just to get the discussion started. I got the idea after I started participating in SinonJS and someone from Jest reached out to us in order to use a shared code component.

What do you think?

(And I want to point out that "no" is also a perfectly acceptable response here)


Full disclosure - I am a part of the MobX team - MobX is written and is the brainchild of @mweststrate - I am also probably quite terrible at Vue itself :D

It's possible Michel reached out in the past (or vice versa) and the discussion simply isn't public.

discussion

Most helpful comment

Any chance we could get this discussion going @sodatea @yyx990803?

What would be a better way to interact?

All 4 comments

Hello, your issue has been closed because it does not conform to our issue requirements. In order to ensure every issue provides the necessary information for us to investigate, we require the use of the Issue Helper when creating new issues. Thank you!

Don't mind if this is closed or open in order to keep the tracker just bugs - ping @yyx990803 though.

Any chance we could get this discussion going @sodatea @yyx990803?

What would be a better way to interact?

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

okjesse picture okjesse  ·  49Comments

ecmel picture ecmel  ·  52Comments

ShuvoHabib picture ShuvoHabib  ·  40Comments

smolinari picture smolinari  ·  116Comments

rpkilby picture rpkilby  ·  50Comments