Happy 2018 everyone! This plan captures our work in January. This is a 5 week iteration. We will ship early February.
The endgame details for this iteration are tracked in #42374
Below is a summary of the top level plan items. Given the large number of explorations, we'll diverge from our usual practice of having plan items for all bullets upfront. This time we'll add them as we go.
Legend of annotations:
| Mark | Description |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| :runner: | work in progress |
| :hand: | blocked task |
| :muscle: | stretch goal for this iteration |
| :red_circle: | missing issue reference |
| :large_blue_circle: | more investigation required to remove uncertainty |
| :black_circle: | under discussion within the team |
nvm
configuratons in node launch configs #25386 @weinandhtml
and css
files #29113 @ramya-rao-avsce
- Warn when package.json
misses repository
entry #41677 @joaomorenoCode action
API to stable #34664 @jrieken @mjbvz @ts-check
for our JS code #41678 @joaomoreno @egammasrc
attributes and href
in html #2037 @octref @aeschli Adopt logging service @joaomoreno the adoption by the #41680 team
:muscle: Render white space for selection option #1477 @ramya-rao-a
hi,are you sure update electron to 2.0? The last electron version is v1.8.2-beta.3.
We haven't done it yet, this is just the plan for the month. And the ✋ means we're blocked.
I find the following entry in Roadmap#for-extension-authors, seems completed.
Support migrating the publisher of an extension to another publisher
Does this means we can transfer alice.toy-extension
to bob.toy-extension
, leaving everything else unchanged?
~If so, I'm eager to know when to include the feature, and how to migrate. Thanks.~
[UPDATE] The answer is yes.
Hi, sorry to bother, I'm wondering whether you think #14909 might possibly make it into the next iteration? I think it is quite the dealbreaker for a lot of people who aren't using VSCode right now because of that issue.
If not, could you give an update on the issue as to why it is not being developed?
Thanks!
@aberonni we create the iteration plan at the beginning of an iteration (pls see). We understand that this feature has many up votes, but there are others with more votes. All I can say for now is that the feature is on our radar.
@egamma thanks for getting back to me, that makes perfect sense to me.
@egamma @kieferrm After a quick look at the top 5 tickets it appears they pertain to UI/UX enhancements and it doesn't appear as if any of them made it into this iteration. Most of these pertain to UI/UX enhancements. Do the items in the January 2018 iteration block many of the items below?
I understand the enhancements above involve a lot work and will probably take more than a few iterations to complete. Is there a way the developer team could create a short-term plan on how to address these? Could you put this in the project wiki or a plan document so users could track them? There needs to be a bit more transparency with the community on these sorts of initiatives.
Please keep in mind that the above issues are serious blockers for users coming from other editors who want to migrate their workflows to VSCode but can't because the UI/UX isn't as flexible or efficient resulting in a loss of productivity for them.
@alxgrtnstrngl thanks for your feedback. In addition to the iteration plan we also maintain the roadmap for the next 6 months. We update the roadmap based on user feedback. Several of the items you mention above are already on this roadmap.
Our planning process is documented here https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode/wiki/Development-Process
Guys I saw release notes and I'm impressed. Thank you very much! It's my daily tool which I'm using more than 8 hours per day and I'm every single day happy because of VS Code. Thank you very much! That support, activity, features, bug-fixes, team - it's amazing! 🥇
I'm concerned that "Catchup with latest CSS/less syntax" was checked off when this item that was in the list is still open.
@onetrev Getting full PostCSS/cssnext support is going to take multiple iterations. We've started internal discussion and you'll see more work toward it in future iterations.
With that said, if future CSS features come out of the draft phase, become spec and get supported by major browsers, we will support those features in vscode-css-languageservrice.
Shipped. Closing.
Most helpful comment
Hi, sorry to bother, I'm wondering whether you think #14909 might possibly make it into the next iteration? I think it is quite the dealbreaker for a lot of people who aren't using VSCode right now because of that issue.
If not, could you give an update on the issue as to why it is not being developed?
Thanks!