This plan captures our work on the Remote development extensions in November. We follow the same iteration cycle as VS Code. Although we plan for a whole iteration, we not only ship at the end of an iteration but throughout.
Below is a summary of the top level plan items.
Legend of annotations:
| Mark | Description |
| ------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- |
| :runner: | work in progress |
| :hand: | blocked task |
| :muscle: | stretch goal for this iteration |
| :red_circle: | missing issue reference |
| :large_blue_circle: | more investigation required to remove uncertainty |
| :black_circle: | under discussion within the team |
None.
runArgs for common scenarios: mount points, environment variables https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-remote-release/issues/1201 @chrmartisettings property in attached config files https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-remote-release/issues/1589 @chrmartivscode-dev-containers to speed up first time experiences https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-dev-containers/issues/140 @chuxel - Investigation done, next is completing implementation.Please add some kind of initial Kubernetes support https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-remote-release/issues/12.
Community cannot contribute to this close source plugin. So please evaliate that as the top feature requested with the container label (other than podman).
It would be interesting to have the Remote - Containers extension available for Remote WSL.
Thus the extension would make use of the wsl2 virtual machine docker itself, greatly improving the processing speed of the files that already are on the vm.
@Dijir Remote-Containers should already show the WSL2 containers. Could you open an issue if that doesn't work?
Most helpful comment
Please add some kind of initial Kubernetes support https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-remote-release/issues/12.
Community cannot contribute to this close source plugin. So please evaliate that as the top feature requested with the container label (other than podman).