Vimium: Firefox: vimium keys don't work with service pages

Created on 11 Aug 2017  Â·  9Comments  Â·  Source: philc/vimium

e.g. about:addons etc.

Tested on Firefox 54.0.1 on Linux, Vimium-FF 1.59.

Most helpful comment

That's sad. They don't work with Mozilla addons web-pages as well. Maybe we should open FR to support this in Mozilla Bugzilla.

All 9 comments

WebExtensions (which Vimium is) can’t run on such pages. Only legacy Firefox add-ons can.

Does https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/ also count as a service page? Because I can't get Vimium to do a thing there...

Yes

I think we should be able to reduce the occurrence of questions like this
before they hit github issues by adding more detail to the FAQ and make the
FAQ more prominent/visible to new users.

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Stephen Blott notifications@github.com
wrote:

Closed #2595 https://github.com/philc/vimium/issues/2595.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/philc/vimium/issues/2595#event-1207083057, or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAhlia3B4Ah3pAge35G3VvG5iozMob4ks5sYfb7gaJpZM4O1DLK
.

That's sad. They don't work with Mozilla addons web-pages as well. Maybe we should open FR to support this in Mozilla Bugzilla.

I think that would be reasonable. Here are some pointers on how to do that: https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebExtensions/NewAPIs

Mozilla here is just mimicking Google's behavior for Chrome Web Store, which as well is not really an internal service page.
For security concerns, they said.

I think this issue can be related with this [1].

--
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1418016

That sounds like a duplicate of this issue, closed as WONTFIX. From a comment there:

Since Firefox 57, we can work around the problem by setting the "privacy.resistFingerprinting.block_mozAddonManager" pref to true.

Naturally, less wholesome extensions may try to e.g. block you from uninstalling them or install other extensions, and so I can't recommend using the option unless you are happy taking that risk.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

jkbbwr picture jkbbwr  Â·  3Comments

nick-s-b picture nick-s-b  Â·  4Comments

haroldcarr picture haroldcarr  Â·  4Comments

peter099 picture peter099  Â·  3Comments

devanshuDesai picture devanshuDesai  Â·  4Comments