Vim-prettier: Support for 'prettier-standard-formatter'

Created on 23 Jun 2017  路  10Comments  路  Source: prettier/vim-prettier

I'd like to use it both. If there are an option to specify which tool to be used?

enhancement

Most helpful comment

I think project .prettierrc file must have the highest priority and only then .vimrc

All 10 comments

Hi @alex-shamshurin,

Sorry but the goal of this project is to add support and evolve together with https://github.com/prettier/prettier

I understand that, but I'd like make a little post-processing, pipe the output to standart. Is this a policy restriction?

Hi @alex-shamshurin,

Its not a policy/restriction, however at this stage our main focus is on prettier. I am happy to revisit this issue if there is enough interest around that in the future.

Once again thank you for submitting this request and I am sorry that at this stage we won't be able to action on it.

Since there has been some more interest on supporting other CLI's (https://github.com/prettier/vim-prettier/issues/42) I am now re-opening this issue.

Still interested on working in this issue, will prioritize bumping vim-prettier to support the new prettier 1.6 features then get back to this issue

Does vim-prettifier need some changes to support 1.6? As I read it just formatting a bit different..

Prettier 1.6 adds support for user defined custom configuration, I want to think what would be the best way to integrate that feature in here

I think project .prettierrc file must have the highest priority and only then .vimrc

Do people still think its worth integrating with other CLI's ? or is the prettier configuration settings via .prettierrc enough these days ?

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

tugorez picture tugorez  路  7Comments

mitermayer picture mitermayer  路  6Comments

andreiglingeanu picture andreiglingeanu  路  12Comments

axelav picture axelav  路  4Comments

n-xlkt picture n-xlkt  路  5Comments