Hmm, in this case we should reverse the scale, right?
Yes, at least thats what the documentation says. I am using the online editor https://vega.github.io/new-editor/?mode=vega-lite
Does sort make sense at all for quantitative given the existence of scale.reverse?
@g3o2 -- good point. I think there are distinction between scale.reverse and scale sort order in Vega. We should add reverse and correctly distinguish their behaviors.
It is only now that I've realised that there is indeed no scale.reverse in vega-lite :-)
@g3o2 Previously sort: "descending" maps to reverse in the underlying Vega. However, there is a case where they are different and thus we no longer map sort order to reverse. We still need to add reverse back.
@kanitw is it updated in https://vega.github.io/new-editor/?mode=vega-lite?
Not yet -- that will require a release.