Valkyrie: Polish version of A Glimpse of the Past

[chrismaliszewski]

With @zcaalock we created a Polish version of the scenario including a professional audio reading by Wojtek.

Here is a link to the translation: https://github.com/chrismaliszewski/A_Glimpse_of_the_Past_PL

Also, this file in column D contains issues found in the English translation.

[chrismaliszewski]

@slycozzolino

[chrismaliszewski]

Does anyone have another kind of contact to @slycozzolino?

[zcaalock]

How to upload scenario when original author is not responding?

[chrismaliszewski]

@redwolf2, @NPBruce, @scrubbless, can you help somehow?

[slycozzolino]

Opps. Missed this email. I'll add it.
Sorry about that.

[slycozzolino]

Added and updates made.
As for item 425 all investigators can interact regardless if they have either or non of the items. Think of it like the items are repealing one another like magnets. So the investigators without the items are helping the investigators with the items.

https://github.com/slycozzolino/valkyrie-store/commit/98bce7d15f9f738698f01863991b797e4caf3e17

[chrismaliszewski]

@slycozzolino, you missed my point.

"[...] The investigator carrying the Ritual Dagger Common Item and the Cult Sigil Unique Item or in the same space as an investigator with either item can attempt to destroy the pair."

The logical problem in this sentence is in the middle part:

1. "The investigator carrying the Ritual Dagger Common Item and the Cult Sigil Unique Item..." - this part is clear; if you have both items you can perform the action from point 3.,
2. "...or in the same space as an investigator with either item..." - here is the problem. I think what you wanted to say in the sentence was:

if( 
   (you have one of the items AND there is an investigator with the other one next to you) 
   OR 
   (you don't have the items AND there is an investigator with both of the items next to you)
   OR
   (you don't have the items AND there are investigators next to you with both items)
){
   you can perform the action from point 3.
}

BUT the same sentence can also be read as

if(
   (you don't have any of the items AND you are in the same space as other investigators 
   but they ONLY HAVE ONE OF THE ITEMS in their hand in total)
){ 
   you can perform the action from point 3.
}

Do you see that now? The text suggests that it's possible to perform the action with just one item. What's even worse, the scenario allows it to be. You can fire the event when you only have sigil. Possessing the dagger is not necessary! Yet it's possible to destroy the dagger or both of the items while having only one!

1. "...can attempt to destroy the pair." - the action is clear.

[slycozzolino]

Ah I see
I'll update it.

[chrismaliszewski]

@slycozzolino, Polish audio doesn't work for some reason. You didn't add Polish catalogue from https://github.com/chrismaliszewski/A_Glimpse_of_the_Past_PL. Please add it as it contains translated audio and images. Otherwise, Poles won't be able to solve the sigil puzzle!

[slycozzolino]

Opps! I didn't see the files. I just opened the translation spreadsheet.
I have uploaded everything.
I updated 425
"An investigator in the same space as the investigator or investigators carrying the Ritual Dagger Common Item and the Cult Sigil Unique Item can attempt to destroy the pair."

[chrismaliszewski]

That one also is not good. It doesn't suggest that the investigator carrying the items also can themselves attempt the action.

[chrismaliszewski]

Maybe merge them both together:

If investigators carrying both the Ritual Dagger Common Item and the Cult Sigil Unique Item are in the same space, any investigator at the space can attempt to destroy the pair."

DONE

[slycozzolino]

I don't think it needs it. I thought about adding to the original statement but felt like it became too redundant. It doesn't suggest that they can't do it in which case it would say " in the same space as another investigator or investigators".

[chrismaliszewski]

Do whatever you find good :). I'll be waiting for the scenario update in Valkyrie and will close the topic soon.

[slycozzolino]

It should be up. I'll leave it for now, but try to see if i can find a way to make it more clear without being too long.

[slycozzolino]

Thanks for all your work on this.

[chrismaliszewski]

My pleasure. Everything works now. I'm closing the topic.