tomchristie
👍3
All 4 comments
Just to understand, is the idea that this will integrate into apistar to give it asgi/async functionality?
audiolion
on 14 Jun 2017
The primary aim is to provide the basis for any Python asyncio framework. And yes, I'd like apistar to support that.
There's also a secondary aim of being used with existing WSGI frameworks, in order to support WebSocket functionality. One thing in particular that would be nice would be for uvicorn to be an alternative deployment option to daphne.
tomchristie
on 14 Jun 2017
👍4
Migrating this issue to https://github.com/encode/uvitools/issues/2
tomchristie
on 30 Jun 2017
See also https://github.com/encode/uvitools/issues/3 for a more standard channels deployment style. I'd expect that to land first.
tomchristie
on 30 Jun 2017
Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings
Related issues
vikahl
路
4Comments
divad
路
6Comments
ipmb
路
7Comments
unitto1
路
7Comments
tlc
路
3Comments
Most helpful comment
The primary aim is to provide the basis for any Python asyncio framework. And yes, I'd like apistar to support that.
There's also a secondary aim of being used with existing WSGI frameworks, in order to support WebSocket functionality. One thing in particular that would be nice would be for
uvicornto be an alternative deployment option todaphne.