TypeScript Version: ^3.4.0-dev.20190330
Search Terms:
Reflect.has
in operator
Code
const test1 = (a: { field: number } | {}) => (("field" in a) ? a.field : 0);
const test2 = (a: { field: number } | {}) => Reflect.has(a, "field") ? a.field : 0;
Expected behavior:
Both compile successfully. "in" operator acts as a type guard per https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/10485. Reflect.has should act the same as "in" operator here.
We'd like to use Reflect.has a lot more and this case holds us back. Thank you!
Actual behavior:
"in" operator line compiles; Reflect.has line does not compile. Error:
allPasos.ts:445:31 - error TS2339: Property 'field' does not exist on type '{} | { field: number; }'.
Property 'field' does not exist on type '{}'.
445 Reflect.has(a, "field") ? a.field : 0;
Playground Link:
Related Issues:
This could be a definition of has that would work as you expect:
declare namespace Reflect {
function has<T, K extends PropertyKey>(target: T, propertyKey: K): target is Extract<T, Record<K, any>>;
}
const test2 = (a: { field: number } | {}) => Reflect.has(a, 'field') ? a.field : a;
As a workaround you could add it yourself.
Looks like that does work as a stopgap! Thanks for the suggestion, added that in our custom types code.
Most helpful comment
This could be a definition of
hasthat would work as you expect:As a workaround you could add it yourself.