A meta issue to track additional CI build targets.
- [ ] 32 bit linux.
- [ ] Arm
Ideally, one day we would get real hardware for all of this.
carllerche
All 12 comments
- 32 bit FreeBSD ?
kpp
on 2 Apr 2018
Actually running tests on FreeBSD would be good too....
I'm less concerned about 32bit + FreeBSD immediately as there is more of a difference between windows & *nix than the various sub nixes, but the more the better.
carllerche
on 2 Apr 2018
How about wasm?
kpp
on 2 Apr 2018
How about wasm?
@kpp, actually that would be very interesting and I'd definitely vote for this.
0x7CFE
on 3 Apr 2018
We could theoretically run the tests on FreeBSD the same way that they're run for mio, but it wouldn't gain much coverage. Unlike mio, tokio has little platform-specific code.
asomers
on 19 Jul 2018
wasm is blocked by mio by epoll missing impl in wasm compilers.
kpp
on 19 Jul 2018
The pain factor for running tests on FreeBSD has recently dropped, and Tokio's importance only continues to grow. I think it's time to add FreeBSD CI. I volunteer to do it, if you're interested.
asomers
on 9 Jan 2019
@asomers sure :+1:
carllerche
on 12 Jan 2019
Ok. First you must turn on cirrus-ci for this repository.
asomers
on 12 Jan 2019
@asomers Sorry for the delay. This should be done.
carllerche
on 28 Jan 2019
We can possibly get ARM CI using http://www.shippable.com.
carllerche
on 24 Jun 2019
Closing due to inactivity.
carllerche
on 21 Nov 2019
Related issues
najamelan
路
4Comments
djc
路
4Comments
carllerche
路
4Comments
heretic13
路
3Comments
jonhoo
路
3Comments
Most helpful comment
How about wasm?