I have found a wrong command in curl.md, though I'm not sure if this goes for all platforms. The -I flag does not show just the headers, instead it performs a HEAD request. -i shows the headers, but not just the headers, also the response body.
Could others have a look at how their curl operates?
curl is likely the page with most edits we have :) The most relevant PR seems to be #1240 ("add -I parameter to show header information", by @stoneo), but also pinging @jeremyruppel (from #291), @bobstrecansky (from #696) and @ericbn (from #1019/#1023).
For me, curl -I and curl -i show headers, but -i show response body too. So I don't know better description than current one.
Agreed. I've used -I extensively when I just want to see the response header. -v gives you a lot more, and you can always save the whole output with -o if you want to inspect the body. -i should be used when you want to see the header and the body at the same time.
So are you proposing replacing -i with -v, @ericbn? Or replacing -I instead? We do need to remove something, since we're already at our maximum number of examples for this page.
What about you @bobstrecansky, what change would you propose?
We could rearrange things a little bit:
- Send a request with an extra header using a custom HTTP method:
curl -H 'X-My-Header: 123' -X PUT http://example.com
- Send data in JSON format, specifying the appropriate content-type header:
curl -d '{"name":"bob"}' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' http://example.com/users/1234
The above could be merged into one, maybe like:
- Send data, specifying the content-type header and a custom HTTP method:
curl -d '{"name":"bob"}' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -X PUT http://example.com/users/1234
As for this one:
- Pass a user name and password for server authentication and show headers info only:
curl -u myusername:mypassword -I http://example.com
My suggestion is either we remove the -I or replace it by -v...
I'd rather keep those two separate, for clarity -- see the discussion in #1396.
My suggestion is either we remove the
-Ior replace it by-v...
I suppose it makes sense to remove -I from this example, since it's not directly connected to it. It could be used in a separate example, but we've ran out of space for this page, and -I is probably less fundamental than the examples already present on the page.
-I is useful if you don't care about the request method, because it cuts out a lots of the clutter. -v is useful when you do, as it can be used with any request method.
So what do you suggest @sbrl? Unfortunately the space is limited and we won't be able to cover all use cases, so we have to choose which ones to prioritize.
By the way, I hadn't received a notification of the reactions to my comment -- if @sbrl doesn't have objections, it looks like we'd have consensus to go ahead and remove -I from that example.
@waldyrious Yeah, go ahead.
Most helpful comment
I'd rather keep those two separate, for clarity -- see the discussion in #1396.
I suppose it makes sense to remove
-Ifrom this example, since it's not directly connected to it. It could be used in a separate example, but we've ran out of space for this page, and-Iis probably less fundamental than the examples already present on the page.