Highlighting this as a separate activity coming out of the discussion in issue #6 , some people initiatives that we want to engage with, either for input to some of the material or just as a good way to spread the word.
Software carpentry https://software-carpentry.org/
In terms of publishers, eLife could probably be a good starting point and someone who would be keen. SpringerNature are just across the street from the BL, so inviting them for a chat at some point would be good.
I guess journals that are listed here could be a good starting point, too https://www.software.ac.uk/resources/guides/which-journals-should-i-publish-my-software
Also just found this initiative, no idea if they are any good or still active http://www.replicabilitystamp.org/
I think it would be a great idea to reach out to the Netherlands eScience Centre.
They've a similar initiative, also currently under development: https://guide.esciencecenter.nl/
Not sure how active rOpenSci still is, but going through my repositories list, I realised that I contributed to their reproducibility guide ages ago: http://ropensci.github.io/reproducibility-guide/
Edit: obviously they are super active and @annakrystalli is part of the community, but the reproducibility guide seems to not be updated any longer.
@KirstieJane do you know anyone in Berkeley who's working on this reproducible science curriculum? https://github.com/Reproducible-Science-Curriculum
Closing #184 but making a note here that we should find a way to reach those audiences.
This looks like a really cool project to stay in touch with: https://github.com/jupyter-guide/jupyter-guide
And their README has awesome resources too!