@jlewi @zjj2wry @gaocegege @ScorpioCPH
Do you mean the copyright header? I am not sure if I understand your idea :thinking:
@gaocegege Yes, copyright header for go files is confused, we can make a boilerplate for all go files
SGTM
copyright header for go files is confused.
Do you mean we need an auto-generate script?
Does anyone have a link to what the requirements are for copyrigh/license headers?
/cc @foxish @vishh @aronchick
uh, no idea. /cc @ewilderj
Check out https://opensource.google.com/docs/releasing/preparing/#include-license-file-and-source-code-headers
Who should be the copyright owner: google or kubeflow? I think we should communicate with the community.
I think it has to be Google until Kubeflow becomes part of a foundation (e.g. CNCF). At which point CNCF can be used.
@jlewi Well, I will file a PR to solve the issue.
Actually, it doesn't have to be Google. For TensorFlow, it is just "The TensorFlow Authors." I will check out what ought to be recommended for us, but as a working presumption, I'd go with "The Kubeflow Authors."
Great
On Feb 1, 2018 7:35 AM, "Edd Wilder-James" notifications@github.com wrote:
Actually, it doesn't have to be Google. For TensorFlow, it is just "The
TensorFlow Authors." I will check out what ought to be recommended for us,
but as a working presumption, I'd go with "The Kubeflow Authors."—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/tensorflow/k8s/issues/266#issuecomment-362303047, or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAvcA6DljuztmPpw3suIA1Hi9_MJBNb2ks5tQdm0gaJpZM4RT7Px
.
I can confirm that "Copyright The Kubeflow Authors" is the right copyright line, followed by the Apache 2 header.
@ewilderj The Kubeflow Authors SGTM, and I will update the PR 😄