Since training tools are available on windows, it will be nice if we have training scripts ported too.
There are two ways:
Contributions are appreciated.
I like the Python option :)
me too, but it increase dependency for user that does not need python. Or we try to freezy it ;-)
Should we create extra repository for "test" like this (e.g. tools- experimental)?
Should we create extra repository for "test" like this (e.g. tools- experimental)?
I think this is not needed. We put more scripts in training dir as they are ready.
But still we can also use main repo for development of such tools to provide the best collaborative access.
I did not commit my changes to main repo just because I wanted to notify you first.
Porting of that script is pretty straightforward - prepare some data, run commands.
If we use separate repo - we could issue potential problems with integrating tess code - just extra burden.
vote python and yaml for conf file. C++ and shell is pain in the ass
Python is also used for some related software, for example by the hocr-tools. I think it would be a good choice.
I think this issue is 'solved' so it should be closed now.
Most helpful comment
I like the Python option :)