Currently, WT, defines default mapping for CTRL + SHIFT + \
A chat with Kayla Cinnamon on Twitter has revealled that those bindings can be overridden in the settings.json as follows:
{ "command": null, "keys": "ctrl+shift+3" }
inside the "keybindings": array setting
Windows build number: [run `[Environment]::OSVersion` for powershell, or `ver` for cmd]
Windows Terminal version (if applicable):
位 [Environment]::OSVersion
Platform ServicePack Version VersionString
-------- ----------- ------- -------------
Win32NT 10.0.19041.0 Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.19041.0
Any other software?
This perhaps requires specific hardware to reproduce, so I'll describe what I'm currently using:
Language keyboard settings:
Time zone: UTC+0 (London)
Region: United Kingdom
Region Format: English UK
Windows display language: English UK
Preferred Language English (UK)
Language Options -> Keyboards:
United Kingdom (Apple)
PLEASE NOTE: I've had to remove the windows keyboard (under Keyboards), because having it defined makes using the system un-predictable and automatic keyboard switching being invoke accidentally and causing problems, particularly with not being able to type the # symbol, and @ symbol being swapped over with ", and other differences.
(I have attached some screen shots to help document my settings)

And a couple of pictures of my external keybaord and the inbuilt keyboard with focus on key no 3(拢#)


Windows terminal should not be remapping system level bindings, particularly for low value features like tab switching overriding essential functionality like being able to access the # symbol and for other internation users, these could be other symbols essential to them. This is particluarly an issue for non windows keyboards, ie apple keyboards used with windows bootcamp.
I don't want the # symbol to be tampered with in any way.
This misbehaviour is intermittent too, which makes diagnosing this issue more problematic.
When the keybind is failing, I can't type the # symbol with CTRL + ALT + 3, which is a system wide binding that works for every other application running in windows; it's only Windows Terminal that is doing something different.
The work around provided by Kayla (redefining the keybinding to null), is a sticking plaster. Firstly I don't know if this works consistently yet as I've only just set it and this is an intermittent issue. Really, CTRL + ALT + \
I'm just gonna summon our resident AltGr expert @lhecker
I admit that the choice of Ctrl+Alt+n is slightly unlucky, since many international keyboards have and heavily make use of an AltGr key, for which Ctrl+Alt is an alias on Windows. We kind of knew about this already, but WT now uses those bindings for tab switching and it's certain that quite a few users would be upset if we'd simply removed those. As such I'd say that this issue will not be resolved anytime soon. I believe our best bet is to wait for https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/6732 as it'll add a neat, new & alternative way for tab switching. With that in place we could carefully consider removing the Ctrl+Alt+n bindings by default.
In the meantime the # symbol can be untampered and the show continue by adding the following to the keybindings array within your config file. 馃檪
{ "command" : null, "keys" : "ctrl+alt+1" },
{ "command" : null, "keys" : "ctrl+alt+2" },
{ "command" : null, "keys" : "ctrl+alt+3" },
{ "command" : null, "keys" : "ctrl+alt+4" },
{ "command" : null, "keys" : "ctrl+alt+5" },
{ "command" : null, "keys" : "ctrl+alt+6" },
{ "command" : null, "keys" : "ctrl+alt+7" },
{ "command" : null, "keys" : "ctrl+alt+8" },
{ "command" : null, "keys" : "ctrl+alt+9" },
@plastikfan does the json sample that @lhecker provided work for you to unbind the Ctrl+Alt+N keys and restore the functionality of # for you?
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been marked as requiring author feedback but has not had any activity for 4 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 3 days of this comment.
Yeah that mapping adjustment works, but the way I see it, it is a poor work around to cover up a poor decision, to implement a feature knowing that it is going to cause a problem for some users. Not happy! I wouldn't mind you considering a solution even if it's not high priority. The main point I have an issue with is not taking into account all users. If you're going to make a decision like that, then please document it.
You know what, we'll make sure to avoid binding anything else to ctrl+alt+ in the future. That's about the best we can do at this point - we don't want to break all the users who are currently depending on the existing ctrl+alt+ keybindings.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention!
Most helpful comment
You know what, we'll make sure to avoid binding anything else to ctrl+alt+ in the future. That's about the best we can do at this point - we don't want to break all the users who are currently depending on the existing
ctrl+alt+keybindings.Thanks for bringing this to our attention!