Problem
The following pattern is inefficient from the command-line and often requires an alternate GUI tool:
For example:
In practice, this pattern has so much duplicate typing from the command-line, often people are required to use a GUI tool instead.
Proposal
Add a multi-command feature so the list work flow becomes:
Sounds to me like what you're looking for is the xargs linux tool. A sample using wsl to achieve your above use case:

xargs is close but has problems:
The proposal is more like the multicursor feature in editors. For the above example, one multicommanding typing option would be:
git status
git add {ctrl-alt-select filelist} \
Here I added ctrl-alt-select as a way to specify multi-command mode, but you could also do a keybinding although there's risk of conflict with key bindings.
Honestly with sounds like a _shell_ feature to me, not a _terminal_ feature. The terminal would need to know some pretty intimate details about the shell that's running for this to work in a general sense. How would this functionality work in something like vim or emacs? What about tmux, or even ssh?
That being said, with the tight coupling to the act of _selecting_, something wholly owned by the terminal, it doesn't seem like a purely _shell_ feature only. You'd almost need a dedicated terminal+shell application, like the Powershell ISE.
Maybe I'm wrong on this, and someone can clarify how this could be done in a generic way.
@zadjii-msft, I think you are right that it's a shell feature and not a terminal feature. I think your xargs suggestion was close as well.
I think I can accomplish this in powershell for example by writing an xargs like command that reads clipboard, likely needs to convert forward slashes to backslashes, and just replays commands. So, flow would become:
git status
{alt-select filelist}
ClipArgs git add
For Linux, you can kind of do this with xargs + xclip, although, xclip doesn't seem to work with WSL.
For emacs, this essentially becomes a way to replace a selection with an prefix/postfix version of the selection which isn't necessary. vi has risk of interacting badly with vi modes and also doesn't need the prefix/postfix feature.
@AshrafMichail Good to hear. Closing this issue as you have a work-around.