Tdesktop: QT notifications are now always on the monitor that telegram is on

Created on 7 Oct 2016  路  8Comments  路  Source: telegramdesktop/tdesktop

Steps to reproduce

  1. Have two monitors
  2. Have telegram on monitor A
  3. Have monitor B focused and receive a notification

    Expected behaviour

The notification should show on the active monitor, as they did before

Actual behaviour

The notifications now only arrive on the same monitor as Telegram

Configuration

Operating system:
Arch Linux x64

Version of Telegram Desktop:
10.12

Logs

I don't think any are needed

You can type debugmode in settings and then see ~/.TelegramDesktop/DebugLogs/log_...txt for log files.
Type debugmode in settings again to disable logs.

duplicate

Most helpful comment

same on Windows 10 1607.

The notifications now appear on the monitor telegram is on. Previously they appeared on the main monitor, no matter where Telegram was, which was way better.

Maybe you could add an option to the notification positioning where you can set the monitor?

All 8 comments

same on Windows 10 1607.

The notifications now appear on the monitor telegram is on. Previously they appeared on the main monitor, no matter where Telegram was, which was way better.

Maybe you could add an option to the notification positioning where you can set the monitor?

I'd like to see this as well. It's hard to notice a notification when it's almost out of my peripheral vision.

Hey there!

We're automatically closing this issue since there was no activity in this issue since 363 days ago. We therefore assume that the user has lost interest or resolved the problem on their own. Closed issues that remain inactive for a long period may get automatically locked.

Don't worry though; if this is in error, let us know with a comment and we'll be happy to reopen the issue.

Thanks!

(Please note that this is an automated comment.)

Please, reopen this issue.

Yeah, I never noticed this was closed. I'd rather it get reopened since it's still an issue and could still be improved somewhat.

Are there any chances to change it?

#3681 ?

Closing in favor of #3681 (even though it鈥檚 newer)

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

beppe9000 picture beppe9000  路  3Comments

DRSDavidSoft picture DRSDavidSoft  路  3Comments

abhyrz picture abhyrz  路  3Comments

FunctionalHacker picture FunctionalHacker  路  3Comments

Liudvikas picture Liudvikas  路  3Comments