I have just received two copyright infringement notices from Japan Creative Contents Alliance and Aniplex USA regarding the screenshots[1][2] on Taiga's website:
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
I, the undersigned, CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY that I am an agent
authorized to act on behalf of http://www.japancreativecontentsalliance.com/
whose exclusive copyrights are being infringed. The information in this notice
is accurate.
Original Works & Copyright Holder(s):
Japan Creative Contents Alliance LLC
1201 Orange Street, Suite 600,
One Commerce
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
The work in question is CCopyright Japanese Anime, Title(s):
Gintama
I have a good faith belief that the items or materials listed below are not
authorized by the above owners, their agents or the law and therefore infringe
the owner's rights. Please act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the
infringing material or items listed as follows - the images, videos and/or
download links at the following URL(s):
http://taiga.moe/img/screenshot/2015-04-30_seasons.png
Truthfully,
/S/: Eric Green
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
I, the undersigned, CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY that I am an agent
authorized to act on behalf of http://www.aniplexusa.com/ whose exclusive
copyrights are being infringed. The information in this notice is accurate.
Original Works & Copyright Holder(s):
Aniplex of America Inc
2120 Colorado Ave. Suite 220
Santa Monica CA 90404 USA
The work in question is CCopyright Japanese Anime, Title(s):
Fate/Zero
I have a good faith belief that the items or materials listed below are not
authorized by the above owners, their agents or the law and therefore infringe
the owner's rights. Please act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the
infringing material or items listed as follows - the images, videos and/or
download links at the following URL(s):
http://taiga.moe/img/screenshot/2015-04-30_now-playing.png
Truthfully,
/S/: Eric Green
Now, I could easily update the images to display different anime, obviously (they wouldn't send a notice for _Mars of Destruction_, would they). Or, I could upload them to Imgur instead. But how is this any different than MyAnimeList, Hummingbird or pretty much any other anime-related website that displays poster images?
I wonder if there was any human involved in the process, or if it was just an algorithm that stumbled upon the images and got a match.
PS: I'd rather not blur/pixelate the images as it is the case for mobile apps on Google Play, for instance.
Taiga's fetching the images from MAL right? Not sure why they started with yours. I'm pretty sure MAL, HB, AniList, etc are getting far more hits. On a side note, you may want to check the anime listed on their site.
First off: I am not a lawyer. I am first and foremost a tech person, and tech people tend to overestimate the bounds of free use and copyright flexibility, as well as underestimate the complicated factors that can become involved.
That said, in my opinion screenshots of media and the like fall pretty squarely under fair use—there's a reason that all of Twitter is still operating more-or-less smoothly. In the U.S. (and countries with similar laws), to persecute a work as infringing copyright a claimant needs to prove grounds based on four points of consideration:
(source: Wikipedia)
The second point doesn't indicate much in either direction—the Supreme Court itself has stated that it isn't often much help for deciding cases, though a digital medium's inherent ease of duplication may be considered in particular cases. The other three points are significant though:
Both Aniplex and the Japan Creative Contents Alliance probably outsource their copyright infringement monitoring to the same outside company, which would explain why you received both claims at the same time. These companies often search the web for related content and file claims if it looks like it might be objectionable. In this case Taiga probably failed that test because of its mention of downloading episodes:
Taiga is an open-source desktop application for Windows. It automatically detects the episodes you're watching on your computer and synchronizes your progress with online services. It helps you manage your anime library, discover new series, share watched episodes and download new ones.
(emphasis added)
However, it could have just been an overaggressive claim—that's not unheard of.
Copyright notices can also be handed out in cases such as these as a proxy for other issues. A while back there was a rash of takedown notices sent out to the Twitter accounts of well-known fansubbers for listing screenshots of Funimation anime episodes (but not for the actual fansubbing activities, which are harder to pursue). Though it doesn't make much difference, Funimation didn't order this itself: the companies issuing takedowns on its behalf were operating independently. This is likely a similar situation.
This article is relevant in general here.
I hate to say it, but the simplest thing to do is likely just change the images. In a worst-case scenario, the company could file a claim with Google and get you delisted from the search rankings. Their claim is tenuous at best, but copyright policy leans too far in favour of corporations currently to make the risk worthwhile.
Again: I'm not a lawyer, but those are my thoughts.
_Edit: Clarity, add link to Wikipedia source._
I'd suggest emailing the JCCA here about the claim, as suggested at the bottom of their website: [email protected]
Where to contact Aniplex USA is less clear, but this email may be a good starting point: [email protected]. Tweeting them at @AniplexUSA could also work. Some companies are more responsive to comments over social media than over email.
I've now dug up some more information on it. Seems like the JCCA employs the aptly-named Remove Your Media LLC. to file their takedown notices, and that company has been known to be less than highly discriminating when it comes to the accuracy of their claims. (In fact, I'm pretty sure they're the ones responsible for the infringing-by-proxy takedowns against the fansubbers I mentioned in my previous comment.) Here's a blog post about one person's experience with them, and a follow-up by the same blogger.
_Edit: Did more research; updated post considerably_
That's a tough one...Like @ConnorKrammer said, I think it would be the best to just change the images for now, as it's the easiest. You can think of other solutions afterwards, if that's what you want to do.
I contacted DigitalOcean and here's what they said:
Thanks for getting back to us.
If you do not believe this is a valid complaint, you would need to give us a
DMCA counterclaim and possibly resolve this in court at a later time.
After 5 days, if the content is still up, we will have to disable the
networking on the droplet as per DMCA safe harbour rules.
Let us know if you have any other questions or require any further assistance
Best Regards
GD
DigitalOcean Trust & Safety Specialist
Basically, they're planning to shut down Taiga's website (along with a couple of others that are hosted on the same droplet) if I don't comply.
_mutters angrily about DMCA abuse_
@erengy That's unfortunate. Given how little time 5 days is to get this sorted out, it's probably best to just swap out the images for non-Aniplex and non-JCCA titles (for the latter, they appear to be listed in the right-hand sidebar of their website).
Wish I could help out more, but I'm a bit at a loss of what to do.
I've removed the screenshots from my server and uploaded them to Imgur instead. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
DigitalOcean support told me that I can now consider the case resolved, unless they find another image to file a claim on. They also confirmed that my droplet is no longer at risk of being disabled.
Now we wait for the day someone sends us a copyright infringement notice about the Taiga icon. :tiger:
Most helpful comment
First off: I am not a lawyer. I am first and foremost a tech person, and tech people tend to overestimate the bounds of free use and copyright flexibility, as well as underestimate the complicated factors that can become involved.
That said, in my opinion screenshots of media and the like fall pretty squarely under fair use—there's a reason that all of Twitter is still operating more-or-less smoothly. In the U.S. (and countries with similar laws), to persecute a work as infringing copyright a claimant needs to prove grounds based on four points of consideration:
(source: Wikipedia)
The second point doesn't indicate much in either direction—the Supreme Court itself has stated that it isn't often much help for deciding cases, though a digital medium's inherent ease of duplication may be considered in particular cases. The other three points are significant though:
Both Aniplex and the Japan Creative Contents Alliance probably outsource their copyright infringement monitoring to the same outside company, which would explain why you received both claims at the same time. These companies often search the web for related content and file claims if it looks like it might be objectionable. In this case Taiga probably failed that test because of its mention of downloading episodes:
(emphasis added)
However, it could have just been an overaggressive claim—that's not unheard of.
Copyright notices can also be handed out in cases such as these as a proxy for other issues. A while back there was a rash of takedown notices sent out to the Twitter accounts of well-known fansubbers for listing screenshots of Funimation anime episodes (but not for the actual fansubbing activities, which are harder to pursue). Though it doesn't make much difference, Funimation didn't order this itself: the companies issuing takedowns on its behalf were operating independently. This is likely a similar situation.
This article is relevant in general here.
I hate to say it, but the simplest thing to do is likely just change the images. In a worst-case scenario, the company could file a claim with Google and get you delisted from the search rankings. Their claim is tenuous at best, but copyright policy leans too far in favour of corporations currently to make the risk worthwhile.
Again: I'm not a lawyer, but those are my thoughts.
_Edit: Clarity, add link to Wikipedia source._