Hello，
Can you please add support for QUIC ?
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tsvwg-quic-protocol-00
Alion548
All 6 comments
👍
The next very interesting _google standard thing_
ghost
on 11 Sep 2018
Just to be up to date, suggested naming is now HTTP/3 (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/RLRs4nB1lwFCZ_7k0iuz0ZBa35s)
For those who are interested official workinggroup https://quicwg.org
ghost
on 13 Nov 2018
Bump.
antonydevanchi
on 3 Oct 2019
Any idea when HTTP3 support might arrive to Swoole? and is there any public roadmap we can track? Super excited about this project. 🤩
eldadfux
on 17 Oct 2020
Great, if swoole 4.6 could support http3, we can serve our websites behind NAT (Yes: 1.Full, 2.Restricted Cone, No: 3.Port Restricted Cone, 4.Symmetric).
diyism
on 28 Dec 2020
Wow! It looks super promising if we can try it in one of the next releases. I understand it's matter of time for Swoole team to implement it, but we still need it) Even it's postponed till version 4.7, we're still looking for that Swoole feature
vadymmasiuk
on 6 Jan 2021
Related issues
andreybolonin
·
4Comments
onanying
·
3Comments
rovico
·
4Comments
sshymko
·
3Comments
pthreat
·
3Comments
Most helpful comment
Wow! It looks super promising if we can try it in one of the next releases. I understand it's matter of time for Swoole team to implement it, but we still need it) Even it's postponed till version 4.7, we're still looking for that Swoole feature