Stylelint: README.md not published in v.6.9.0

Created on 8 Jul 2016  路  3Comments  路  Source: stylelint/stylelint

Describe the issue. Is it a bug or a feature request (new rule, new option, etc.)?

An issue where the readme file hasn't been published to npm for stylelint version 6.9.0. In v6.8.0 the file has been published. I had a look through the differences but couldn't see any likely causes. Could this just be a temporary publish blip?

This issue prevents npm start from working on the stylelint website repo

What stylelint configuration is needed to reproduce this issue?

npm install [email protected]
ls node_modules/stylelint/ | grep "README"
-rw-r--r-- 6.6K 30 Jun 09:18 README.md

rm -rf ./node_modules/
npm install [email protected]
ls node_modules/stylelint/ | grep "README"

Which version of stylelint are you using?

6.9.0

What did you expect to happen?

The file README.md to be included in node_modules/stylelint after running npm install stylelint

What actually happened (e.g. what warnings or errors you are getting)?

The file was missing.

needs discussion

Most helpful comment

Likely caused by https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/5082

I've since updated to npm version to 3.10.x (from 3.9.x) and so I'm hoping this is going to away with the next patch release of stylelint.

In the meantime you can manually copy the README file into your node_modules/stylelint directory of your stylelint.io project. npm start should work then.

All 3 comments

Likely caused by https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/5082

I've since updated to npm version to 3.10.x (from 3.9.x) and so I'm hoping this is going to away with the next patch release of stylelint.

In the meantime you can manually copy the README file into your node_modules/stylelint directory of your stylelint.io project. npm start should work then.

Fixed in 7.0.0

I noticed seconds before v7 was published that over at https://www.npmjs.com/package/stylelint it only stated the latest release was v6.8.0, and not 6.9.0. I've checked and 7.0.0 is now displayed.

Not that the above was actually an issue but worth noting for reference if this issue is ever required for reference in the future...

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings